Inclusion
Needs attention
The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Last reviewed: October 2026 · Inspection data and key information above update regularly, however, this review below is refreshed bi-annually and may not reflect recent changes. Contact the nursery directly to confirm current arrangements. If you spot anything outdated or inaccurate, please let us know.
Pond creatures, a rope swing and soup-making for a homeless shelter give Green Twigs a recognisable character. In March 2026, outdoor exploration sat alongside practical independence and opportunities to think about other people. This Chiswick setting has capacity for 35 children.
At its 12 March 2026 inspection, Ofsted judged achievement, behaviour and routines, welfare, curriculum and leadership to meet the expected standard, with safeguarding standards met, but inclusion needing attention. That last judgement deserves serious weight alongside the outdoor experiences.
In March 2026, children investigated pond creatures and used identification charts to name their discoveries. Natural materials became structures, while scissors and tape supported creative work. The Montessori and forest school emphasis had concrete expression in practical tasks and exploration rather than simply a name.
The early years foundation stage provides the framework for learning, development and care: here, March 2026 examples included counting construction blocks, comparing towers and building vocabulary through conversation. Matching jars with their lids gave children a practical problem to solve; sand trays offered opportunities to practise movements used in writing.
Outdoor activity involved tricycles, climbing and a rope swing. Children practised judging their surroundings before swinging and used hammers and nails with staff support. These were opportunities to combine physical activity with learning how to handle risk.
In March 2026, a peace-table with sensory toys and reflective stories helped children work through their feelings. Children also made soup for a local homeless shelter, connecting care for others with something they could actually do.
Communication with families combined everyday conversations, newsletters and online applications. Parents joined forest-school activities and shared favourite stories. Children learning English received help from staff who spoke their home language, and individual support plans were discussed with families and reviewed.
At the March 2026 inspection, Ofsted found that children with SEND made progress from their starting points, but access to additional funding and professional advice was sometimes too slow, funding strategies lacked clarity, and staff development and speech-and-language interventions needed strengthening. Support mechanisms existed; securing specialist help promptly was the weakness.
Families supplied packed lunches in March 2026, with staff sharing guidance on healthy choices and discussing dietary needs and feeding routines with parents.
The address is 14th Acton Scouts, The Scout Hut, Chiswick, London, W4 1AT. In March 2026, children attending were aged two to four, and opening hours ran from 9am to 3pm, Monday to Friday.
The March 2026 action required timely applications for funding, access to external professional advice and targeted staff development by 12 June 2026. This is the latest published action position, rather than a basis for assuming what happened after that deadline.
Green Twigs merits consideration for families drawn to practical learning and outdoor exploration: its March 2026 day included pond investigations, construction and supported use of tools. The balance is clear. Inclusion needed attention, and families requiring additional support should give timely access to funding and specialist advice priority in their decision.
At the 12 March 2026 inspection, Ofsted judged five areas to meet the expected standard and inclusion to need attention; safeguarding standards were met.
Children attending in March 2026 were aged two to four. The nursery has capacity for 35 children in total.
In March 2026, children explored pond life, identified creatures using charts and built with natural materials. Outdoor play also included tricycles and a rope swing.
In March 2026, Ofsted identified delays in obtaining funding and professional advice, unclear funding strategies and a need to strengthen staff development and speech-and-language support.
In March 2026, the setting opened Monday to Friday, from 9am to 3pm.
Get in touch with the nursery directly
Inspection outcome and judgement breakdown
FMS Inspection Score
Good
Based on 6 subcategory ratings
Ofsted Report Card
No single overall grade under the current framework
Inspected: 12 March 2026
Safeguarding standards met
Inclusion
Needs attention
Achievement
Expected standard
Behaviour, attitudes and establishing routines
Expected standard
Children's welfare and wellbeing
Expected standard
Curriculum and teaching
Expected standard
Leadership and governance
Expected standard
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted. Always refer to the official Ofsted report for the full picture of a setting’s inspection outcome.
Other nurseries and nursery schools close to this profile.
Ealing, W4 1BB
Ealing council
Full day care
0.1 mi away
Hammersmith and Fulham, W3 7HJ
Hammersmith and Fulham council
Full day care
0.2 mi away
Ealing, W3 7LJ
Ealing council
Full day care
0.3 mi away
Ealing, W3 7JZ
Ealing council
Full day care
0.4 mi away
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including Ofsted early years registration and inspection data, local authority records, and the setting’s own published material.
FMS Inspection Scores and any assessment on this page are derived from that data using our own methodologies. They are our independent analysis and are not official Ofsted ratings or standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Places, opening arrangements, session patterns, funding eligibility, and fees change without notice, and the nursery and/or local authority should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular nursery, and scores reflect specific inspection evidence rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.