Quality of education
Good
The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Last reviewed: October 2026 · Inspection data and key information above update regularly, however, this review below is refreshed bi-annually and may not reflect recent changes. Contact the nursery directly to confirm current arrangements. If you spot anything outdated or inaccurate, please let us know.
A storybook followed by cutting and tasting real fruit gives Park Avenue Pre-School its clearest character: familiar experiences become opportunities to talk, count and explore. In October 2024, children chose books from a cosy corner and could select activities independently. Small, concrete experiences shaped the day.
At its October 2024 inspection, Ofsted rated the provision Good and judged safeguarding effective, while identifying quieter children's participation and the precision of staff development as areas needing attention. The setting has 30 places in total, at Park Avenue, Enfield, EN1 2BA.
In October 2024, The Very Hungry Caterpillar became more than a reading activity: children recalled the story while preparing fruit and discussing flavours. Comparing a watermelon with smaller fruits brought size into the conversation; counting pieces added another mathematical task. These examples connect language and number work to something children can handle and describe.
The early years foundation stage is the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care. Here, the October 2024 examples show learning through play, conversation and everyday routines.
Imaginative play also supplied vocabulary. In October 2024, children put bandages on dolls and used large toothbrushes and toothpaste in play, with adults introducing words associated with dental care. Staff asked questions that invited children to investigate ideas and work out answers. However, confident children sometimes dominated activities, leaving quieter children with less opportunity to join in.
At the October 2024 inspection, Ofsted found that individual time with staff helped children settle, assessments prompted targeted support and outside-agency involvement where appropriate, and regular discussions helped parents understand learning priorities and support them at home.
Care routines had a clear personal element in October 2024: adults explained nappy changes gently as they carried them out. Children practised managing everyday tasks themselves, including handwashing and disposing of used tissues. Respectful behaviour was modelled by adults, and praise reinforced actions such as tidying up.
The address is Park Avenue, Enfield, EN1 2BA. In October 2024, the pre-school occupied a church hall in Bush Hill Park and opened during term time, Monday to Friday, from 9am to 3pm.
Children attending at that date were aged two to four. In October 2024, the setting also provided funded early education for children aged two, three and four; that describes its provision at the time of the visit.
Park Avenue's October 2024 account suits families drawn to story-led activities, practical exploration and children developing independence through ordinary routines. Its term-time pattern at that date would suit families seeking care within the school-term calendar. The Good judgement carries two useful cautions: participation needs to reach quieter children, and staff development needs greater precision.
Ofsted rated it Good in October 2024 and judged safeguarding effective. Improvement priorities concerned quieter children's participation and staff development.
In October 2024, the children attending were aged two to four. The setting has 30 places in total.
In October 2024, children used The Very Hungry Caterpillar as a starting point for preparing fruit, discussing flavours, comparing sizes and counting pieces.
In October 2024, it provided funded early education for two-, three- and four-year-old children.
At the October 2024 inspection, Ofsted found that staff discussed children's progress and next learning steps with parents and offered ideas for supporting learning at home.
Inspection outcome and judgement breakdown
FMS Inspection Score
Good
Based on 4 subcategory ratings
Official Ofsted Grade
Good
Inspected: 23 October 2024
Safeguarding: Yes
Quality of education
Good
Behaviour and attitudes
Good
Personal development
Good
Effectiveness of leadership and management
Good
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted. Always refer to the official Ofsted report for the full picture of a setting’s inspection outcome.
Other nurseries and nursery schools close to this profile.
Enfield, EN1 2EU
Enfield council
Full day care
0.1 mi away
Enfield, EN1 2PP
Enfield council
Full day care
0.4 mi away
Enfield, EN1 2RY
Enfield council
Full day care
0.4 mi away
Enfield, EN1 2RS
Enfield council
Full day care
0.4 mi away
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including Ofsted early years registration and inspection data, local authority records, and the setting’s own published material.
FMS Inspection Scores and any assessment on this page are derived from that data using our own methodologies. They are our independent analysis and are not official Ofsted ratings or standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Places, opening arrangements, session patterns, funding eligibility, and fees change without notice, and the nursery and/or local authority should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular nursery, and scores reflect specific inspection evidence rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.