Quality of education
Good
The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Last reviewed: October 2026 · Inspection data and key information above update regularly, however, this review below is refreshed bi-annually and may not reflect recent changes. Contact the nursery directly to confirm current arrangements. If you spot anything outdated or inaccurate, please let us know.
In June 2025, a water wall built around children's interests illustrated Nesbit Nippers' practical exploration, shared discoveries and learning shaped by what caught children's attention. This Eltham setting has capacity for 20 children at Turning Pages Centre, 6 Nesbit Road, London SE9 6HS.
At its June 2025 inspection, Ofsted rated the provision Good, praised support for children with special educational needs and/or disabilities, and judged safeguarding effective. Children attending then were aged two to four. The strongest examples involved children working together, from investigating water flow to solving problems with ice.
In June 2025, children used the water wall to fill containers and explore how pouring from different positions changed the flow. Staff had developed it in response to an interest in sensory and water play. It gave children a shared experiment they could return to and investigate together.
The early years foundation stage sets the framework for children's learning, development and care; here, the June 2025 examples showed learning through practical play. Small dinosaurs trapped in frozen eggs prompted discussion about dinosaur features and which tools could release them. The activity brought language and problem-solving into the same task.
Outdoors that June, regular bug hunts encouraged close observation of nature. Children tended tomatoes, cucumbers, strawberries and peppers, learning what plants needed to grow. Harvesting produce for families at the end of term picnic connected that care with something children could share.
In June 2025, staff worked with parents and other agencies to use consistent strategies for children with additional needs. Younger children received help with sharing and taking turns, while older children exchanged ideas during imaginative play. These are concrete examples of support within everyday activities.
Communication that June included a learning app, text messages, conversations and termly newsletters. Together, these offered parents several ways to follow their child's learning. Children also brushed their teeth after lunch, with staff drawing on a dentist's earlier visit to explain oral care.
Nesbit Nippers is based at Turning Pages Centre in Eltham, within Greenwich. In June 2025, it operated during term time, with weekday morning sessions from 9.25am to 12.25pm and afternoon sessions from 12.30pm to 3.30pm. Those shorter patterns are the practical reference point for families considering attendance.
At that time, the setting received early education funding for children aged two, three and four. This is a dated account of its funding participation, rather than a promise of a funded place.
Nesbit Nippers merits consideration for families seeking morning or afternoon preschool sessions. Its June 2025 strengths were tangible: water experiments, growing food and coordinated support for additional needs. The language improvement priority and committee-notification breach belong alongside those positives when weighing the setting.
Ofsted rated it Good in June 2025 and judged safeguarding effective. The improvement priority was to give children more time to think and answer questions.
Children attending in June 2025 were aged two to four. The setting has capacity for 20 children in total.
In June 2025, children went on regular bug hunts and grew fruit and vegetables intended for sharing with families.
In June 2025, it received early education funding for children aged two, three and four. This does not guarantee a funded place.
In June 2025, weekday sessions ran from 9.25am to 12.25pm and from 12.30pm to 3.30pm during term time.
Get in touch with the nursery directly
Inspection outcome and judgement breakdown
FMS Inspection Score
Good
Based on 4 subcategory ratings
Official Ofsted Grade
Good
Inspected: 18 June 2025
Safeguarding: Yes
Quality of education
Good
Behaviour and attitudes
Good
Personal development
Good
Effectiveness of leadership and management
Good
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted. Always refer to the official Ofsted report for the full picture of a setting’s inspection outcome.
Other nurseries and nursery schools close to this profile.
Greenwich, SE9 6NZ
Greenwich council
0.2 mi away
Greenwich, SE9 6BP
Greenwich council
0.2 mi away
Greenwich, SE9 6NZ
Greenwich council
Full day care
0.2 mi away
Greenwich, SE3 9QX
Greenwich council
Sessional day care
0.3 mi away
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including Ofsted early years registration and inspection data, local authority records, and the setting’s own published material.
FMS Inspection Scores and any assessment on this page are derived from that data using our own methodologies. They are our independent analysis and are not official Ofsted ratings or standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Places, opening arrangements, session patterns, funding eligibility, and fees change without notice, and the nursery and/or local authority should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular nursery, and scores reflect specific inspection evidence rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.