Quality of education
Good
The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Last reviewed: September 2026 · Inspection data and key information above update regularly, however, this review below is refreshed bi-annually and may not reflect recent changes. Contact the nursery directly to confirm current arrangements. If you spot anything outdated or inaccurate, please let us know.
Apple Tree Montessori Nursery, Stanmore is a sessional childcare provider at 123 Uxbridge Road, Harrow. Montessori forms part of the registered name, which means the label identifies this setting; its documented learning framework is the Early Years Foundation Stage. Ofsted rated it Good in May 2024, with Good judgements across education, behaviour, personal development and leadership. The report found effective safeguarding and a nursery where close parent partnerships and a key-person system helped staff understand children well.
Its strongest documented quality is the progression from warm care into practical independence. Everyday routines built independence in stages, giving children increasing responsibility as they grew. Care and learning therefore reinforced each other rather than competing for time.
The Early Years Foundation Stage means children learn through play, daily routines and adult-guided experiences rather than formal lessons. Staff use children's interests and next steps to plan work that builds communication, physical development, relationships and independence through the day. Staff planned from what each child knew and needed to learn next. Children, including those with special educational needs and disabilities, made good progress.
Communication work was specific. Language support changed with children's development, beginning with responsive back-and-forth communication and extending into deliberate vocabulary building. Songs, rhymes and stories kept that work part of the everyday routine. Active outdoor play combined physical challenge with shared play, so movement and social learning happened together.
There were limits alongside these strengths. Leaders were asked to adapt group activities more carefully because the layout sometimes prevented every child from taking part. Parents should explore how group experiences are now organised for different ages and needs.
Familiar practitioners were reliable emotional anchors, supporting both reassurance and confidence. Praise and warmth helped children develop resilience and independence. Children also checked on a friend who had bumped their head, reflecting the empathy adults modelled.
Support for SEND was a clear strength. Inclusive practice was practical: adults altered an everyday health-learning task so children with different developmental and sensory profiles could join in. Safeguarding arrangements were effective, with an open culture centred on children's interests.
Behaviour was generally good, but staff did not always apply behaviour strategies consistently. Its improvement point was for children to receive clearer, more consistent messages and understand why expectations exist. Consistency across the staff team remains an important decision point.
Professional development had a practical structure. Staff described regular feedback, reflection on their work and opportunities to discuss training needs. That matters because the two improvement points both depend on adults applying shared expectations and adapting plans together, not on buying new equipment.
Parents reported valuing the team's communication and warmth, as well as the progress their children made. The key-person arrangement gives that partnership a clear route: a familiar practitioner can connect information from home with the child's comfort, interests and next learning steps. For a child who is unsettled or needs adjustments, continuity of information can be as important as the planned activity itself.
The provider record describes care from nine months to five years and 40 registered places. These are whole-setting figures, not a room roster or a promise about the number of children attending together.
Funded early education was recorded in May 2024 for two-, three- and four-year-olds. Current written terms need to cover attendance patterns, closures, funded delivery and additional charge categories. The available material does not establish the position on meals or non-food consumables.
Apple Tree Montessori Nursery, Stanmore has documented strengths in warm relationships, purposeful language work and strong inclusive practice. Its practical approach to independence is especially appealing. As children grew, familiar care routines became opportunities to take on more for themselves.
The setting may suit families who value a key-person relationship and learning rooted in everyday experiences. The important follow-up is operational. The decisive practical question is whether the current attendance pattern fits them and how leaders addressed the improvement points on group access and consistent behaviour guidance.
Ofsted rated it Good in May 2024 across all assessed areas. Safeguarding was effective, and inspectors found warm relationships, ambitious planning and good progress.
The provider record gives an age range from nine months to five years. The current room arrangement should identify the most suitable provision for each child's age.
Language and independence were concrete strengths. Everyday stories and songs supported communication, while familiar care routines gave children progressively more responsibility.
The 2024 inspection recorded funded early education for two-, three- and four-year-olds. Current nursery terms should set out eligibility, delivery and charge details.
Current sessions, closures, room organisation, funding terms, meals and consumables should be considered alongside how leaders have improved access to group activities and consistency in behaviour guidance.
Closed: Bank Holidays & 1 week at Christmas
Get in touch with the nursery directly
Manager
Summer Jafferali (Deputy Manager)
Owner
Apple Tree Montessori Nurseries
Inspection outcome and judgement breakdown
FMS Inspection Score
Good
Based on 4 subcategory ratings
Official Ofsted Grade
Good
Inspected: 31 May 2024
Safeguarding: Yes
Quality of education
Good
Behaviour and attitudes
Good
Personal development
Good
Effectiveness of leadership and management
Good
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted. Always refer to the official Ofsted report for the full picture of a setting’s inspection outcome.
Other nurseries and nursery schools close to this profile.
Harrow, HA3 6DQ
Harrow council
Full day care
0.2 mi away
Harrow, HA3 6RR
Harrow council
Out-of-school day care
0.3 mi away
Harrow, HA3 7DH
Harrow council
Out-of-school day care
0.4 mi away
Harrow, HA3 7DH
Harrow council
0.4 mi away
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including Ofsted early years registration and inspection data, local authority records, and the setting’s own published material.
FMS Inspection Scores and any assessment on this page are derived from that data using our own methodologies. They are our independent analysis and are not official Ofsted ratings or standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Places, opening arrangements, session patterns, funding eligibility, and fees change without notice, and the nursery and/or local authority should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular nursery, and scores reflect specific inspection evidence rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.