Quality of education
Good
The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Last reviewed: October 2026 · Inspection data and key information above update regularly, however, this review below is refreshed bi-annually and may not reflect recent changes. Contact the nursery directly to confirm current arrangements. If you spot anything outdated or inaccurate, please let us know.
Pastel walls, gentle lighting and an indoor climbing wall give Ohana Centre an unusual combination of calm surroundings and physical challenge. In June 2025, these were part of a specialist setting where therapy and nursery activities worked alongside each other. The practical appeal is care organised around individual children.
At its June 2025 inspection, Ofsted rated Ohana Centre Good, judged safeguarding effective and praised the support for children with special educational needs. The centre has capacity for 22 children aged 24 to 60 months, at 262 Fulham Road, London SW10 9EL.
In June 2025, learning followed children's interests and individual plans. The early years foundation stage sets expectations for learning, development and care: here, play included counting, storytelling, movement and practising communication.
Sign language and other communication methods accompanied spoken language. Children retold The Very Hungry Caterpillar using props, while scooping rice gave staff opportunities to introduce words about pouring and emptying. These were concrete ways to connect language with actions.
Mathematical play in June 2025 linked written numbers with quantities: children paired numeral cards with cards showing dots. Staff also counted flower petals with children, used songs involving counting and introduced shape names through puzzles. Numbers therefore appeared in games, objects and music rather than only as symbols to recognise. For parents, these examples give a concrete picture of the learning behind the activities: matching a quantity, hearing a number sequence and putting a name to a shape all had a place in the day.
The sensory room offered coloured light filters and materials with different textures. In June 2025, children also mixed paint, explored drums and tackled the indoor climbing wall and tunnels. Movement sessions used scarves to practise arm movements, giving physical activity a place alongside quieter exploration.
In June 2025, therapists assessed children's needs and worked with staff on individual goals in dedicated therapy rooms. Children's preferences informed planning, and staff used warm interactions and positive responses to behaviour. This made individual needs part of the daily organisation rather than a separate activity.
Parent communication included termly progress meetings in June 2025, alongside flexible feedback and ideas for learning at home. Families also received information about local special educational needs support. Everyday independence mattered too: children practised putting on coats and shoes, fed themselves and helped clear away after play.
Group games in June 2025 gave children opportunities to take turns and share. Alongside dressing and tidying, these activities brought practice in doing things independently together with practice in doing things with others. The emphasis extended beyond an individual therapy goal to the ordinary demands of spending a nursery day with other children.
Progress monitoring also formed part of the June 2025 approach. Therapists and practitioners agreed goals for each child, tracked learning and supported children whose development was falling behind. For a family considering therapeutic nursery care, the connection between assessment, a plan and subsequent monitoring matters: an initial assessment was followed by attention to how the child was getting on. Termly discussions with parents provided a further opportunity to talk about that progress.
Behind the children's activities, leaders spent time in the group room demonstrating practice and watching staff work in June 2025. They offered feedback and held regular staff discussions, while therapists based at the centre trained practitioners in supporting learning. This linked specialist input with the staff delivering everyday nursery activities. It also gave leaders opportunities to review practice directly, alongside the individual plans and parent conversations.
The address is 262 Fulham Road, London SW10 9EL. Opening hours are 8am to 4pm on weekdays; closures include bank holidays, a summer week and two weeks at Christmas.
In June 2025, the centre accepted government childcare funding. That dated participation sits alongside its specialist care offer; it does not establish any individual family's entitlement.
Ohana Centre merits consideration by families seeking nursery care alongside individual therapeutic support, with a weekday schedule ending at 4pm. Its June 2025 combination of therapy rooms, sensory resources and practical independence gives the setting a clear identity. The curriculum's treatment of growing things and the local community remains a useful point to explore.
Ofsted rated the centre Good at its inspection on 4 June 2025 and judged safeguarding effective.
The centre caters for children aged 24 to 60 months and has 22 places in total.
In June 2025, children used story props, sign language, counting games and sensory materials, with physical play on an indoor climbing wall and through tunnels.
In June 2025, the centre accepted government funding for childcare places.
Opening hours are 8am to 4pm, Monday to Friday. The centre closes on bank holidays, for one week in summer and for two weeks at Christmas.
Closed: Bank Holidays, 1 week over the Summer & 2 weeks at Christmas
Get in touch with the nursery directly
Inspection outcome and judgement breakdown
FMS Inspection Score
Good
Based on 4 subcategory ratings
Official Ofsted Grade
Good
Inspected: 4 June 2025
Safeguarding: Yes
Quality of education
Good
Behaviour and attitudes
Good
Personal development
Good
Effectiveness of leadership and management
Good
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted. Always refer to the official Ofsted report for the full picture of a setting’s inspection outcome.
Other nurseries and nursery schools close to this profile.
Kensington and Chelsea, SW10 9NA
Kensington and Chelsea council
0.0 mi away
Kensington and Chelsea, SW10 0JN
Kensington and Chelsea council
Full day care
0.2 mi away
Kensington and Chelsea, SW10 0AU
Kensington and Chelsea council
Full day care
0.2 mi away
Kensington and Chelsea, SW10 0AY
Kensington and Chelsea council
0.3 mi away
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including Ofsted early years registration and inspection data, local authority records, and the setting’s own published material.
FMS Inspection Scores and any assessment on this page are derived from that data using our own methodologies. They are our independent analysis and are not official Ofsted ratings or standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Places, opening arrangements, session patterns, funding eligibility, and fees change without notice, and the nursery and/or local authority should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular nursery, and scores reflect specific inspection evidence rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.