Nursery School

Toad Hall Montessori Nursery School

37 St. Marys Gardens, Kennington, London, SE11 4UF·Lambeth council·Ofsted URN: 144720
Full day care
Nursery School
2 years to 5 years
20 places
Registered 27 Oct 1992
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register
FMS Inspection Score
Elite
10/10
Nursery official?Claim Profile

Last reviewed: September 2026 · Inspection data and key information above update regularly, however, this review below is refreshed bi-annually and may not reflect recent changes. Contact the nursery directly to confirm current arrangements. If you spot anything outdated or inaccurate, please let us know.

Toad Hall Montessori Nursery School

At a Glance

A role-play post office, child-led minibeast investigations and regular yoga give a clear sense of how Toad Hall Montessori Nursery School turns ordinary experiences into purposeful learning. This is a small Kennington setting for children aged two to five, with capacity for 20 children at 37 St. Marys Gardens, SE11 4UF.

Ofsted's November 2025 report card judged achievement, behaviour and routines, welfare, curriculum, inclusion, and leadership at the strong standard. Safeguarding standards were met. The earlier full inspection in February 2020 judged the nursery Outstanding, but families should use the newer report card for the most recent account of practice.

The Nursery Experience

The Early Years Foundation Stage is woven through practical activities, meaning communication, physical development, mathematics and personal development are built into play rather than treated as isolated lessons. During the 2025 inspection, children wrote letters in a role-play post office, weighed parcels and threw balls at numbered targets. A play-dough activity brought together vocabulary, small-muscle control, size, capacity and colour mixing.

Children also helped shape activities. When they asked for minibeasts, staff used magnifying glasses and questions about habitats to extend their knowledge and language. Books mattered too: children shared stories in the reading corner and acted out The Tiger Who Came to Tea with props. The report describes an outdoor garden, regular trips and physical play involving balancing, throwing, catching and dancing.

These examples show staff extending an idea rather than rushing children to the next activity. In the post office, mark-making became letters to family and friends, parcel weighing introduced number recognition, and target games added movement. During play-dough making, children sequenced the recipe, compared spoon sizes and experimented with food colouring. These are small, concrete episodes, but together they show how the curriculum connects language, mathematics, coordination and problem-solving. Children could then revisit what they knew, explain it and take pride in the result.

Care and Support

Relationships are a defining strength in the 2025 account. Children had clear bonds with staff and sought trusted adults for comfort and to share their work. Circle time and books provided opportunities to discuss feelings, while one-to-one support and role play helped children regulate emotions. Regular yoga added stretching and breathing exercises.

Inclusion was judged at the strong standard. Staff swiftly identified children with special educational needs and/or disabilities, set specific targets and reviewed them with families and outside professionals. Staff supported children learning English as an additional language through both their home language and English. Parents received updates and ideas for extending activities at home.

Daily routines supported independence as well as comfort. Children selected activities before welcome circle time, followed instructions at group time and helped tidy away. Adults praised kindness and manners, and a wiggle song reinforced kind hands. Attendance and punctuality were monitored for continuity, while returning children could be resettled with a parent after an absence.

Safeguarding standards were met in November 2025. Leaders had made protecting children a shared duty, with worries noticed and handled. Outdoors and on trips, adults discussed how children could keep themselves safe. The report also found that individual adjustments helped every child take part, with training chosen around specific needs and new learning applied to day-to-day practice.

Practical Information

The nursery accepts children from two to five and has capacity for 20 children. The provider record describes term-time opening. Families should obtain the nursery's current schedule and quotation directly before making comparisons.

At inspection, families were asked to bring fruit and vegetables to share, and staff sent healthy-eating guidance home. Treat that as a November 2025 snapshot rather than a current charging or food policy.

Things to Consider

  • Attendance and costs. Ask for one current written schedule covering session choices, term dates, minimum attendance, funded hours and any extras before making comparisons.
  • Curriculum in practice. The inspection gives detailed examples of interest-led Early Years Foundation Stage learning. Families for whom the setting's named educational tradition is important should discuss how that shapes the daily routine.

The Verdict

Toad Hall Montessori Nursery School is best evidenced as a small, relationship-led setting where practical play carries real educational purpose. The 2025 inspection account is consistently positive: children were confident, emotionally secure and deeply engaged, while inclusion and curriculum planning reached Ofsted's strong standard. It suits families who value close adult bonds, language-rich play and careful SEND support. The strong emphasis on children revisiting prior learning is another plus. Celebration-of-work scrapbooks let children share success with adults, while careful questioning encouraged them to recall knowledge and solve problems. The main homework is practical, because current sessions, funding delivery and extras need confirming directly.

FAQs

Ofsted's November 2025 report card placed all six evaluated areas at the strong standard and found safeguarding standards met. The previous full inspection in February 2020 judged the nursery Outstanding.

The provider record and 2025 inspection evidence cover children aged two to five. No branch-published room names or room age bands were available.

Inspection examples include a role-play post office, play-dough making across several learning areas, story acting with props, minibeast investigations and regular yoga.

Families should ask the nursery for its current funded-hours policy and a written breakdown of extras.

Families should ask the nursery to confirm its session choices, clock times, term dates and any minimum attendance requirement.

Opening Hours

Fri
08:30-16:15
Mon
08:30-16:15
Tue
08:30-16:15
Thu
08:30-16:15
Wed
08:30-16:15
Opening schedule
Open term time
Full days
Available

Contact Information

Get in touch with the nursery directly

37 St. Marys Gardens, Kennington, London, SE11 4UF

Manager

Vivien Rees (Head)

Ofsted Inspection

Inspection outcome and judgement breakdown

10/10

FMS Inspection Score

Elite

Based on 4 subcategory ratings

Official Ofsted Grade

Outstanding

Inspected: 4 February 2020

Safeguarding: Yes

Inspection History

4 Feb 2020Most recent full inspectionOutstanding
26 Jan 2016Previous full inspectionOutstanding
13 Jun 2011Earlier full inspectionGood

Inspection Judgements

Quality of education

Outstanding

Behaviour and attitudes

Outstanding

Personal development

Outstanding

Effectiveness of leadership and management

Outstanding

Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted. Always refer to the official Ofsted report for the full picture of a setting’s inspection outcome.

Disclaimer

Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including Ofsted early years registration and inspection data, local authority records, and the setting’s own published material.

FMS Inspection Scores and any assessment on this page are derived from that data using our own methodologies. They are our independent analysis and are not official Ofsted ratings or standings.

While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Places, opening arrangements, session patterns, funding eligibility, and fees change without notice, and the nursery and/or local authority should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.

FindMySchool does not endorse any particular nursery, and scores reflect specific inspection evidence rather than overall quality.

To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.