Quality of education
Good
The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Last reviewed: October 2026 · Inspection data and key information above update regularly, however, this review below is refreshed bi-annually and may not reflect recent changes. Contact the nursery directly to confirm current arrangements. If you spot anything outdated or inaccurate, please let us know.
Chicks hatching from eggs, pretend firefighting in the garden and hospital role-play give Coxheath Preschool a recognisable character: learning starts with things children can handle, try and talk about. Those examples come from June 2025. Its current home is Coxheath Village Hall, where it welcomes children aged two to four, with 30 places in total.
At its June 2025 inspection, Ofsted rated the preschool Good, found safeguarding effective and judged that children, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities, were making good progress. The useful qualification is about how adults make the most of play: conversations needed more room for children's ideas, and group routines sometimes interrupted learning.
This is a term-time morning preschool, rather than an offer built around a whole working day. Its charitable, committee-run structure also gives families a practical route into the organisation through volunteering and committee involvement.
The early years foundation stage provides the framework for children's learning, development and care. Here, the June 2025 examples show what that means in practice: children explored nature, used language in pretend play and practised sharing roles with friends.
A life cycle week made the natural world tangible. In June 2025, children watched incubated eggs hatch and cared for the chicks before their return to a farm. That sequence gave them more than a single encounter with an animal: they could follow change and take part in care.
Hospital play brought language and cooperation together. During the same period, children alternated between doctor and patient, discussed what needed treating and used vocabulary such as skeleton and x-ray. Staff joined their play and explained unfamiliar words. The limitation was in the follow-through: adults sometimes moved conversations along before developing what a child had contributed.
In the garden, pretend fires gave children a reason to persevere with water spray bottles. They kept practising the action until they could manage it. This was a small physical challenge with a clear purpose inside their game, rather than an isolated exercise.
In June 2025, outings included a church visit connected with Easter and a trip to the library to select books. These experiences linked preschool learning with places children could recognise beyond the setting. No frequency is implied by those examples.
Diwali activities included making lanterns and painting hands. Books and dressing-up resources represented different backgrounds, while staff learnt simple words from children's home languages. Together, these gave children concrete ways to encounter cultural differences through play and conversation.
Relationships had a clear structure in June 2025. A key-person arrangement linked children with staff, and practitioners gathered information about what each child could already do when they started. Planning then used that starting point to identify what came next, with weekly staff discussions and regular assessment supporting the process.
Communication with parents combined electronic updates and conversations in person. In June 2025, staff shared information about learning and worked with families on individual needs. For parents, that creates a connection between what a child is doing at preschool and what they might continue at home, rather than leaving learning confined to the session.
The current team includes safeguarding and special educational needs lead roles. The preschool follows Kent County Council Child Protection Procedures and has an Equal Opportunities Policy. These are named arrangements and responsibilities; the dated safeguarding judgement above is the assessment of their effectiveness.
Snacks and drinks are provided during sessions. In June 2025, children could use a snack bar when hungry, alongside familiar arrangements for coats and resources. That independence is useful, but the daily rhythm was not consistently protected: calling children together sometimes cut across play already under way.
The morning session runs from 9am to noon, Monday to Friday, during term time. The age range is two to four. This offers a regular morning pattern while leaving afternoons outside the preschool session, an important distinction for families organising work or other care.
Coxheath Rising Five Preschool is a separate provision within the group. Its afternoon sessions should not be treated as an afternoon booking option at Coxheath Preschool.
Enquiries can be made through the contact form, by telephone or by email to the supervisor. Visits are arranged for a mutually convenient date and time. The setting is at Coxheath Village Hall, Stockett Lane, Coxheath, Maidstone, ME17 4PT.
Free Early Education Funding can be used for sessions where the child meets government requirements. Private payment is also offered. Families paying privately can settle the term's charge together or divide it into three payments across the term; payment methods include bank transfer, cheque and cash.
Fee enquiries can be emailed to administrator@coxheathpreschool.co.uk. The session and funding page brings the morning timetable and payment arrangements together, making the term-time structure central to planning childcare.
Coxheath Preschool suits families seeking a term-time morning pattern for a child aged two to four, whether using eligible funded childcare or paying privately. The village-hall setting and charitable committee structure give it a clear community identity.
The June 2025 examples make the educational offer easy to picture: caring for chicks, choosing library books and using new words in shared play. The decision also deserves attention to adult conversation and the organisation of group time. Those are specific aspects of the child's morning to explore, alongside whether the short-session timetable fits the family's care arrangements.
Ofsted rated Coxheath Preschool Good on 10 June 2025 and found safeguarding effective. Improvement points concerned developing conversations from children's ideas and reducing interruptions to play and learning.
It welcomes children aged two to four at Coxheath Village Hall, with 30 places in total.
In June 2025, activities included a life cycle week with hatching eggs and caring for chicks, hospital role-play and visits to a church and library. These combined practical exploration, language and shared play within the early years foundation stage.
Free Early Education Funding is accepted for sessions where the child meets government requirements. Private payment is also offered.
Coxheath Preschool's morning session runs from 9am to noon, Monday to Friday, during term time.
Get in touch with the nursery directly
Inspection outcome and judgement breakdown
FMS Inspection Score
Good
Based on 4 subcategory ratings
Official Ofsted Grade
Good
Inspected: 10 June 2025
Safeguarding: Yes
Quality of education
Good
Behaviour and attitudes
Good
Personal development
Good
Effectiveness of leadership and management
Good
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted. Always refer to the official Ofsted report for the full picture of a setting’s inspection outcome.
Other nurseries and nursery schools close to this profile.
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including Ofsted early years registration and inspection data, local authority records, and the setting’s own published material.
FMS Inspection Scores and any assessment on this page are derived from that data using our own methodologies. They are our independent analysis and are not official Ofsted ratings or standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Places, opening arrangements, session patterns, funding eligibility, and fees change without notice, and the nursery and/or local authority should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular nursery, and scores reflect specific inspection evidence rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.