Quality of education
Good
The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Last reviewed: October 2026 · Inspection data and key information above update regularly, however, this review below is refreshed bi-annually and may not reflect recent changes. Contact the nursery directly to confirm current arrangements. If you spot anything outdated or inaccurate, please let us know.
Independence built through filling a spray bottle, conversation developed through brick play: Mortimer Hall's July 2024 picture is of a preschool where everyday activities carry a clear learning purpose. It operates in a village hall in Old Marston, Oxford, and has capacity for 26 children.
At its July 2024 inspection, Ofsted rated Mortimer Hall Good, found safeguarding effective and identified tailored support for children with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) as a strength. Children attending then were aged two to five. That age range describes the children at that visit.
The early years foundation stage sets the framework for children's learning, development and care: here, the July 2024 examples included language, movement and learning to do things independently. Adults extended conversations during construction play, adding vocabulary that children then used to express their ideas.
In July 2024, children practised jumping with skipping ropes and climbed substantial play equipment with little assistance. Physical learning had concrete challenges. Filling spray bottles offered another chance to keep trying and complete a task themselves, rather than immediately handing it to an adult.
Staff also used facial expressions and discussion to explore emotions. Younger children learnt to recognise feelings, while older children could explain why losing a toy might make someone sad. These were practical ways to connect words with experiences children understood.
In July 2024, the key-person arrangement gave children a familiar adult to turn to for comfort. For children with SEND, staff reviewed interests and needs each day and stayed nearby when reassurance was needed. This made support responsive to the individual child rather than a single routine for everyone.
Behaviour expectations were reinforced gently: children practised waiting before moving to the hall and responded to reminders about safe play. An online journal also connected parents with preschool life.
However, the July 2024 inspection identified two weaknesses: professional development needed sharper direction to address uneven staff understanding of children's learning, and parents were not consistently told what their children should learn next. The latter matters because parents need clear next learning goals to support their child's development at home.
Mortimer Hall's address is Mortimer Hall, Oxford Road, Oxford OX3 0PH. In July 2024, its opening hours were 9am to 3pm on weekdays, during term time.
At that date, the preschool received early education funding for children aged two, three and four. This is a dated account of its funding participation, rather than a promise of a funded place.
Mortimer Hall suits families who value familiar key-person relationships, practical independence and language developed through play. Its July 2024 strengths were tangible, especially individual support and opportunities to persevere. The decision also rests on how clearly staff now explain children's learning goals and how the attendance arrangements fit family life.
Ofsted rated it Good in July 2024 and found safeguarding effective.
Children attending in July 2024 were aged two to five. The setting has capacity for 26 children in total.
In July 2024, staff expanded vocabulary during brick play, encouraged children to persevere with filling spray bottles and provided physical challenges using skipping ropes and climbing equipment.
In July 2024, it received funding for early education for children aged two, three and four.
In July 2024, parents could access an online journal. Communication about children's next learning goals was an area requiring improvement.
Get in touch with the nursery directly
Inspection outcome and judgement breakdown
FMS Inspection Score
Good
Based on 4 subcategory ratings
Official Ofsted Grade
Good
Inspected: 12 July 2024
Safeguarding: Yes
Quality of education
Good
Behaviour and attitudes
Good
Personal development
Good
Effectiveness of leadership and management
Good
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted. Always refer to the official Ofsted report for the full picture of a setting’s inspection outcome.
Other nurseries and nursery schools close to this profile.
Oxford, OX3 0PJ
Oxfordshire council
0.1 mi away
Oxford, OX3 0AY
Oxfordshire council
0.4 mi away
Oxford, OX3 0DW
Oxfordshire council
Full day care
0.7 mi away
Oxford, OX2 6UD
Oxfordshire council
Full day care
0.8 mi away
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including Ofsted early years registration and inspection data, local authority records, and the setting’s own published material.
FMS Inspection Scores and any assessment on this page are derived from that data using our own methodologies. They are our independent analysis and are not official Ofsted ratings or standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Places, opening arrangements, session patterns, funding eligibility, and fees change without notice, and the nursery and/or local authority should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular nursery, and scores reflect specific inspection evidence rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.