Quality of education
Good
The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Last reviewed: October 2026 · Inspection data and key information above update regularly, however, this review below is refreshed bi-annually and may not reflect recent changes. Contact the nursery directly to confirm current arrangements. If you spot anything outdated or inaccurate, please let us know.
A growing patch, a digging area and a play room shared across age groups give The Cabin at Tamar View a practical, hands-on character. Beside Tamar View Community Centre in St Budeaux, this Plymouth nursery combines indoor space for different developmental needs with outdoor exploration in all weathers. There is also a smaller quiet room for group activities, giving the setting more than one space in which to organise the day.
At its May 2025 inspection, Ofsted judged the nursery Good, found that its curriculum was delivered effectively and that safeguarding arrangements were effective. The strongest examples involved children doing things for themselves: opening food packaging, using signs alongside speech and turning outdoor play into counting and comparison. These were everyday learning opportunities rather than separate lessons.
The nursery has 38 places in total and accepts children aged 12 to 48 months. Its opening hours are 8am to 4pm, Monday to Thursday, during term time.
The early years foundation stage provides the framework for children's learning, development and care: here, play and everyday routines create opportunities to practise communication, independence and working together. In May 2025, children took turns as the day's helper, ringing a handbell to signal tidying up. Songs accompanied the task, and children understood what came next. Having a useful role made participation part of the routine.
Communication involved more than spoken words. During that same period, staff paired signs with objects to make meanings clearer, and children combined actions with a seasonal poem. This gave them several ways to connect a word with its meaning. Story sessions included puppets, while children remembered dinosaur names and discussed a dung beetle's role. Stories prompted discussion as well as listening.
There was a clear limitation. In May 2025, some whole-group activities continued beyond the point at which children could sustain their interest. Adapting these gatherings to keep children involved was the required improvement. That matters alongside the positive examples: an engaging activity also needs a length and format that work for its participants.
The growing patch and digging area make outdoor space useful for exploration, while the large play room accommodates different ages and developmental needs. The smaller quiet room provides another setting for group work. These spaces support different kinds of activity rather than relying on one room for everything.
In May 2025, garden play included children jumping from a small hill, marking their landing points and comparing distances. Counting backwards became part of the game. The physical challenge and mathematical conversation belonged to the same activity, giving number work an immediate purpose.
Regular community outings also featured at that time. A visit to the toll bridge's visitor centre led to children building their own version with guttering above a water tray. The connection was concrete: something encountered locally became something to investigate through play back at nursery.
At the May 2025 inspection, Ofsted found effective partnerships with parents and inclusive practice, including support for families to access other professionals and recognition of children's cultures and home languages. The examples give this judgement substance: family support extended beyond nursery activities, while children's own backgrounds helped shape what they explored together.
In May 2025, books went home for shared reading, and Super Ted, a travelling teddy bear, accompanied children for the weekend before becoming the subject of conversations with their peers. This linked home experiences with nursery talk. Children had something personal to contribute, rather than being asked only to respond to an adult's topic.
Cultural learning during that period included Maslenitsa festival and American Independence Day. These were connected to the families attending, making children's backgrounds part of the shared experience. Play about paramedics also helped children explore how other people support them, using bandages and teddies to act out care.
Lunch arrangements in May 2025 put younger children first, with older children eating later. Staff sat with them and helped children learn to open packaging independently. The value was practical: mealtimes offered a chance to persevere with a manageable task, with adult help close by.
The address is Tamar View Community Resource Centre, Miers Close, Plymouth, PL5 1DJ. Opening runs from 8am until 4pm on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday, during term time. This is a clear fit for a family timetable built around those days and the school-term calendar; the afternoon finish needs to work with parents' commitments.
Enquiries can be made by telephone on 01752 297837, and visits can be arranged by calling the nursery. Me2 funded care is offered at Tamar View. The term-time setting is an important part of that practical picture, rather than an incidental detail beside the activities.
The Cabin at Tamar View suits families seeking term-time childcare within a Monday-to-Thursday week. Its growing patch, digging area and separate quiet room give the daily environment useful variety. The May 2025 examples add substance to the learning picture: signing supported communication, garden games prompted mathematical thinking, and a local outing became construction play.
The main educational consideration is the length and organisation of whole-group activities. For parents comfortable with the opening timetable, this is a nursery with concrete examples of children learning through participation, alongside a specific improvement to explore during a visit.
Ofsted judged the nursery Good at its May 2025 inspection. The improvement required was to adapt whole-group activities so that children remained engaged.
The nursery accepts children aged 12 to 48 months and has 38 places in total. Its large play room caters for different age groups, with a smaller quiet room for group activities.
The outdoor space includes a growing patch and digging area. In May 2025, children used signs alongside speech, explored counting through garden games and took Super Ted home before sharing their experiences with other children.
Yes. Me2 funded care is offered at this term-time nursery.
The nursery opens from 8am to 4pm, Monday to Thursday, during term time.
Closed: School Holidays, Bank Holidays & Christmas
Get in touch with the nursery directly
Manager
Claire Hawkey (Manager)
Owner
K and S Childcare Ltd
Inspection outcome and judgement breakdown
FMS Inspection Score
Good
Based on 4 subcategory ratings
Official Ofsted Grade
Good
Inspected: 1 May 2025
Safeguarding: Yes
Quality of education
Good
Behaviour and attitudes
Good
Personal development
Good
Effectiveness of leadership and management
Good
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted. Always refer to the official Ofsted report for the full picture of a setting’s inspection outcome.
Other nurseries and nursery schools close to this profile.
Plymouth, PL5 1EJ
Plymouth council
Full day care
0.1 mi away
Plymouth, PL5 1DD
Plymouth council
0.1 mi away
Plymouth, PL5 1NE
Plymouth council
Full day care
0.3 mi away
Plymouth, PL5 1RH
Plymouth council
0.4 mi away
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including Ofsted early years registration and inspection data, local authority records, and the setting’s own published material.
FMS Inspection Scores and any assessment on this page are derived from that data using our own methodologies. They are our independent analysis and are not official Ofsted ratings or standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Places, opening arrangements, session patterns, funding eligibility, and fees change without notice, and the nursery and/or local authority should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular nursery, and scores reflect specific inspection evidence rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.