Quality of education
Good
The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Last reviewed: October 2026 · Inspection data and key information above update regularly, however, this review below is refreshed bi-annually and may not reflect recent changes. Contact the nursery directly to confirm current arrangements. If you spot anything outdated or inaccurate, please let us know.
Balance bicycles, storytelling and conversations about family give Al-Madina Nursery, Cradley Heath its clearest character: a setting where movement, language and personal development share the day. Based at Macefields Mission Hall on Claremont Street, it has capacity for 57 children. At its September 2025 inspection, Ofsted rated the nursery Good and judged its safeguarding arrangements effective.
The offer is term-time care, with separate morning and afternoon sessions. Arabic teaching styles sit alongside its early-years framework, and children of all religions and cultural beliefs are welcomed. For families, the practical attraction is a choice between two parts of the day rather than one continuous attendance pattern.
The EYFS provides the framework for children's learning and care: play, conversation and practical experiences help them develop language, movement and social skills. Arabic teaching styles are an additional part of the offer alongside that framework.
In September 2025, the curriculum emphasised communication, physical development and children's understanding of themselves. Children discussed their relatives and emotions, then chose materials for pictures of their families. Stories introduced similarities and differences between faiths and cultures. These are concrete ways to connect learning with the people and experiences children know.
Songs brought vocabulary into movement. Children identified parts of their bodies while following instructions, while shared stories prompted predictions about what might happen next. Adults explained unfamiliar words rather than simply reading on. Language appeared across activities, rather than being confined to a single task.
The same September 2025 observations also exposed a limitation: some activities followed children's interests more closely than their individual learning needs. Staff were not consistently clear about the next skill each child needed to develop. Enjoyment mattered, but planning needed sharper individual purpose.
During September 2025, children steered balance bicycles around obstacles, practising coordination and control. The game What's the time, Mr Wolf? combined counting with movement: children took measured steps towards friends before running away. Staff linked the game to differences in speed, giving number language a physical context.
Choice and responsibility also featured in that day's routines. Children selected play resources, sought adult help and put equipment back into its designated baskets before outdoor play. Small tasks gave them opportunities to act independently and participate in the shared day.
In September 2025, children settled readily, approached staff confidently and asked for assistance. Staff also made time for conversations with parents about children's learning. That contact gave families a way to discuss development with the adults caring for their children.
At the September 2025 inspection, Ofsted found that staff understood how to identify and support children with special educational needs and/or disabilities, worked with other professionals and helped children make good progress. This gives the support picture more substance than a broad promise of inclusion: identification and professional collaboration were both part of the practice assessed.
A September 2025 handwashing activity used water-filled gloves with marks for children to wash away. Children washed the marks away while learning about hygiene. The idea made an everyday care routine tangible through something they could handle and change.
Participation was less consistent for quieter children. During that same month, staff sometimes missed opportunities to draw less-confident children into discussion and hear their ideas. A child who enjoys listening still needs chances to contribute; this was one of the nursery's two improvement priorities.
Morning sessions run from 8.30am to 11.30am; afternoon sessions run from 12.15pm to 3.15pm. Attendance is term-time. Those separate blocks are useful for families arranging care around either the earlier or later part of the day, while school holidays need a different plan.
The address is Macefields Mission Hall, Claremont Street, Cradley Heath, B64 6HR. An online enquiry form includes Cradley Heath as a branch choice and takes a child's date of birth, family contact details and further information.
In September 2025, the nursery offered government-funded childcare places. That establishes participation at the inspection date; it does not determine an individual family's entitlement or attendance arrangement.
Al-Madina suits families seeking either morning or afternoon term-time sessions, with Arabic teaching styles alongside the EYFS and an open welcome across religions and cultural beliefs. The September 2025 examples give its day recognisable substance: bicycles, stories, family pictures and practical hygiene activities. The decision points are equally concrete: individual learning plans and participation for quieter children deserve close attention.
Ofsted rated Al-Madina Nursery, Cradley Heath Good on 5 September 2025 and found safeguarding effective.
Children were aged two to four at the September 2025 inspection.
It follows the EYFS, the framework for early learning and care through play and practical experiences, alongside Arabic teaching styles.
It offered government-funded childcare places in September 2025. Eligibility and the nursery's attendance arrangements are separate matters.
Morning sessions run from 8.30am to 11.30am and afternoon sessions from 12.15pm to 3.15pm. The nursery operates during term time.
Get in touch with the nursery directly
Inspection outcome and judgement breakdown
FMS Inspection Score
Good
Based on 4 subcategory ratings
Official Ofsted Grade
Good
Inspected: 5 September 2025
Safeguarding: Yes
Quality of education
Good
Behaviour and attitudes
Good
Personal development
Good
Effectiveness of leadership and management
Good
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted. Always refer to the official Ofsted report for the full picture of a setting’s inspection outcome.
Other nurseries and nursery schools close to this profile.
Cradley Heath, B64 6HT
Sandwell council
0.1 mi away
Cradley Heath, B64 6DR
Sandwell council
0.2 mi away
Sandwell, B64 5LS
Sandwell council
Full day care
0.3 mi away
Dudley, DY2 9RZ
Dudley council
0.4 mi away
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including Ofsted early years registration and inspection data, local authority records, and the setting’s own published material.
FMS Inspection Scores and any assessment on this page are derived from that data using our own methodologies. They are our independent analysis and are not official Ofsted ratings or standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Places, opening arrangements, session patterns, funding eligibility, and fees change without notice, and the nursery and/or local authority should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular nursery, and scores reflect specific inspection evidence rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.