Quality of education
Good
The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Last reviewed: October 2026 · Inspection data and key information above update regularly, however, this review below is refreshed bi-annually and may not reflect recent changes. Contact the nursery directly to confirm current arrangements. If you spot anything outdated or inaccurate, please let us know.
At its September 2025 inspection, Tiddlywinks Pre-School, Leyland combined parachute songs, dinosaur vocabulary and shopping for cooking ingredients, turning everyday experiences into opportunities to listen, talk and learn. At its September 2025 inspection, Ofsted rated the setting Good and judged safeguarding effective.
The pre-school has 42 places in total. In September 2025, children attending were aged two to four, and the setting occupied grounds belonging to Leyland Methodist Infant School, with older children using a room inside the school.
In September 2025, communication and language received close attention. Staff allowed children time to process questions and shape their answers, while dinosaur books introduced vocabulary such as excavator. This gave conversation a purpose beyond simply naming familiar objects. The detail matters: children had time to work out what an adult meant before replying, while books supplied new words to try. Listening and speaking were woven into an activity children could share, rather than treated solely as isolated exercises.
The early years foundation stage provides the framework for children's learning, development and care. Here, the September 2025 activities included painting and cutting to practise hand control, and parachute singing that combined movement with listening for signals. Children selected toy animals to determine songs, giving them a part in shaping the activity.
During that inspection, the singing also required children to pause together and watch for the adult's cue before restarting. Joining in meant paying attention as well as remembering a song. Painting and cutting offered a different kind of practice, involving the small movements needed to control tools. The curriculum organised learning in a planned sequence, although staff's understanding of individual learning goals was uneven.
Outdoor play had a practical physical emphasis that month: a bubble machine prompted children to operate handles, blow bubbles and chase them around the outdoor area. Beyond the setting, outings included sharing stories and songs with older residents, buying ingredients at a supermarket, exploring a vehicle museum and listening to sounds on local walks. These experiences connected learning with people and places beyond the playroom. Each outing had a different educational purpose in September 2025: shopping brought mathematics into buying ingredients, the museum introduced the past, and walks encouraged children to notice sounds around them. Sharing books and singing with older people added contact across generations. For parents who value learning through everyday situations, these were concrete examples of how the curriculum extended beyond indoor activities.
In September 2025, key persons collected detailed information about children's communication, including their speaking and listening. Familiar routines also helped children manage the day: they used name or photograph cards to mark their presence and identified their own drinks in the same way. Children also put finished paintings on a drying rack themselves. These small responsibilities gave them opportunities to recognise their belongings and take care of their work. The September 2025 picture was mixed, however: opportunities to act independently sat alongside moments when adults took over manageable tasks.
Parents' accounts that month described collaboration over settling and language development, alongside information that helped them extend learning at home. The relationship had a practical purpose: adults could connect what children were doing at the pre-school with support at home.
Staff support also featured in September 2025. Practitioners described regular conversations with leaders about their wellbeing and professional development, and a team development day involved exchanging practice and refreshing skills with colleagues. This provided time for staff to discuss their work together, a relevant feature alongside the need for clearer sharing of children's individual learning goals.
The address is Leyland Methodist Infant School, Canberra Road, Leyland, PR25 3ET. In September 2025, opening hours were 9am to 3pm, Monday to Friday, and the pre-school provided government-funded places for children aged two, three and four.
Sharing a school site does not guarantee a Reception place.
Tiddlywinks suits families who value conversation, group music and learning through ordinary community experiences. Its September 2025 day offered concrete opportunities to practise listening and explore beyond the setting, balanced by clear improvement priorities around shared learning goals and children's independence.
Ofsted rated the pre-school Good at its September 2025 inspection and found safeguarding effective.
In September 2025, children attending were aged two to four. Older children used a room within Leyland Methodist Infant School.
In September 2025, activities included parachute singing, dinosaur books, painting and cutting, alongside outings to a supermarket, a vehicle museum and a home for older people.
In September 2025, it provided government-funded places for two-, three- and four-year-old children.
No. Sharing the school site does not guarantee a Reception place.
Get in touch with the nursery directly
Inspection outcome and judgement breakdown
FMS Inspection Score
Good
Based on 4 subcategory ratings
Official Ofsted Grade
Good
Inspected: 30 September 2025
Safeguarding: Yes
Quality of education
Good
Behaviour and attitudes
Good
Personal development
Good
Effectiveness of leadership and management
Good
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted. Always refer to the official Ofsted report for the full picture of a setting’s inspection outcome.
Other nurseries and nursery schools close to this profile.
South Ribble, PR25 3SH
Lancashire council
Full day care
0.3 mi away
South Ribble, PR25 2ES
Lancashire council
Full day care
0.3 mi away
South Ribble, PR25 3SP
Lancashire council
Full day care
0.4 mi away
South Ribble, PR25 2TN
Lancashire council
Full day care
0.5 mi away
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including Ofsted early years registration and inspection data, local authority records, and the setting’s own published material.
FMS Inspection Scores and any assessment on this page are derived from that data using our own methodologies. They are our independent analysis and are not official Ofsted ratings or standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Places, opening arrangements, session patterns, funding eligibility, and fees change without notice, and the nursery and/or local authority should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular nursery, and scores reflect specific inspection evidence rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.