Quality of education
Good
The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Last reviewed: October 2026 · Inspection data and key information above update regularly, however, this review below is refreshed bi-annually and may not reflect recent changes. Contact the nursery directly to confirm current arrangements. If you spot anything outdated or inaccurate, please let us know.
Voting for stories, comparing construction sizes and practising cutlery skills with dough gave Sticky Fingers Pre-School a practical, participatory character in May 2025. This is the Redbridge setting, based within Redbridge Primary School in Millbrook, Southampton. Its capacity is 32 children in total; the children attending in May 2025 were aged two to four.
At its 7 May 2025 inspection, Ofsted rated the provision Good and judged safeguarding effective. Two improvement priorities temper that judgement: making children's next learning steps more precise and keeping parents consistently informed about development.
Morning, afternoon and full-day attendance are offered, giving families different ways to organise preschool around their week.
The early years foundation stage provides the framework for children's learning, development and care: here, the May 2025 examples included learning through construction, conversation, songs and practical play. It is the common foundation for early-years provision, rather than a separate enrichment programme.
In May 2025, children compared the dimensions of construction materials and talked about familiar places after finding local pictures. These were recognisable starting points for mathematical language and conversation.
Choosing the day's story or song involved a vote, with children counting the choices together. This brought number work into a real decision and gave children experience of accepting an outcome when their preference did not win. Their ideas influenced the day.
Practical independence also featured in teaching. Dough play with knives and forks gave children a chance to rehearse movements used at meals. Children who lacked opportunities to use steps at home could practise climbing them at preschool.
The limitation was precision. In May 2025, leaders had planned the curriculum, but some practitioners did not fully understand why particular knowledge or skills were being taught. Learning targets could be too general to guide the next piece of teaching closely. For parents, the useful distinction is between a busy activity programme and a clear explanation of what their own child is working towards.
Paddington Bear and The Smartest Giant in town are among the named key groups at Redbridge. They are key-group names, rather than descriptions of separate age-banded rooms. This gives families a recognisable group identity alongside the setting's broader preschool offer.
In May 2025, the preschool occupied a purpose-built building on the primary-school site. Children could turn to resources in a calming area to help manage their feelings. Staff had developed this space after wellbeing training. It provided a practical place to pause within the learning environment.
Familiar songs accompanied changes of activity, including handwashing and the end of the session. A repeated musical cue made the routine understandable through something children could join in with, rather than relying only on spoken instructions.
At the May 2025 inspection, Ofsted found that children had secure relationships with their key person and that visual prompts and signing supported communication, including for children with special educational needs and/or disabilities. The concrete mechanisms matter: pictures helped explain the sequence of the day, while signing gave children another way to express what they needed.
During that same month, older children practised managing their clothing, looking after possessions and clearing away after snacks. Staff maintained consistent expectations, and children sometimes helped one another follow the preschool's rules. Care and preparation for the next stage were closely connected through everyday tasks.
Cooking provided a link between preschool and home in May 2025, with recipes passed to families to try together. However, updates about developmental milestones were inconsistent. Friendly relationships with staff and dependable information about learning are different things; families need both to understand how home activities can support the next step.
Tapestry memos carry Redbridge's reminders and important updates, alongside termly newsletters. That gives families a channel for setting news. It should be considered separately from the individual developmental information highlighted in the improvement priorities.
In May 2025, staff worked with other professionals on transitions, and children had opportunities to explore school play spaces before moving on. Familiarity with a setting can make the change more concrete for a young child.
Sharing a site with Redbridge Primary School does not guarantee a Reception place. Families still need to use the local authority admissions process for a state-school application; preschool attendance and school admission are separate decisions.
Redbridge offers a morning session from 8.30am to 11.30am, an afternoon session from 12pm to 3pm, and a full day from 8.30am to 3pm. The shorter patterns suit families arranging preschool around part of the day, while the full-day option brings a longer period of attendance into the same setting.
In May 2025, the preschool operated on weekdays during school terms.
The setting is at Redbridge Primary School, Studland Road, Millbrook, Southampton, SO16 9BB. Its direct contact is sf.redbridge@stickyfingersps.co.uk or 02380 764717. A Redbridge waiting-list form provides the application route.
In May 2025, the preschool received funding for free early-years education for children aged two, three and four. Redbridge also offers support with claiming childcare funding. Eligibility and the arrangement for a particular child's attendance need to be distinguished from that inspection-time participation.
Families should obtain a current written quotation from the preschool when considering paid childcare.
Sticky Fingers suits families considering morning or afternoon preschool, as well as those wanting its full-day pattern. The strongest May 2025 examples were grounded in ordinary life: making choices, handling cutlery, managing belongings and using familiar routines.
The Good judgement sits alongside specific work to sharpen teaching targets and improve developmental updates. For families, the deciding issue is how clearly those everyday experiences connect to their own child's learning and how consistently that connection is shared with them.
Ofsted rated the preschool Good on 7 May 2025 and judged safeguarding effective. The improvement priorities concerned more precise learning targets and consistent developmental updates for parents.
Children attending in May 2025 were aged two to four. Redbridge's named key groups include Paddington Bear and The Smartest Giant in town; the setting has capacity for 32 children in total.
In May 2025, activities included comparing construction sizes, counting votes for stories or songs, and practising cutlery movements with dough. These linked conversation, number work and independence to practical experiences.
In May 2025, it received funding for free early-years education for children aged two, three and four. Redbridge provides support with claiming childcare funding.
Morning sessions run from 8.30am to 11.30am, afternoon sessions from 12pm to 3pm, and full days from 8.30am to 3pm.
Get in touch with the nursery directly
Inspection outcome and judgement breakdown
FMS Inspection Score
Good
Based on 4 subcategory ratings
Official Ofsted Grade
Good
Inspected: 7 May 2025
Safeguarding: Yes
Quality of education
Good
Behaviour and attitudes
Good
Personal development
Good
Effectiveness of leadership and management
Good
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted. Always refer to the official Ofsted report for the full picture of a setting’s inspection outcome.
Other nurseries and nursery schools close to this profile.
Southampton, SO16 9RJ
Southampton council
Full day care
0.1 mi away
Southampton, SO16 9JA
Southampton council
Sessional day care
0.4 mi away
Southampton, SO16 9DD
Southampton council
Full day care
0.4 mi away
Southampton, SO16 9HZ
Southampton council
0.4 mi away
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including Ofsted early years registration and inspection data, local authority records, and the setting’s own published material.
FMS Inspection Scores and any assessment on this page are derived from that data using our own methodologies. They are our independent analysis and are not official Ofsted ratings or standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Places, opening arrangements, session patterns, funding eligibility, and fees change without notice, and the nursery and/or local authority should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular nursery, and scores reflect specific inspection evidence rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.