Inclusion
Expected standard
The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Last reviewed: October 2026 · Inspection data and key information above update regularly, however, this review below is refreshed bi-annually and may not reflect recent changes. Contact the nursery directly to confirm current arrangements. If you spot anything outdated or inaccurate, please let us know.
Buying fruit for snack time, investigating bugs and learning to manage a coat: Cedartree Preschool's December 2025 nursery day connected learning with ordinary, useful experiences. This Sittingbourne setting has capacity for 20 children. In December 2025, children's welfare and wellbeing received its strongest area judgement.
At its 3 December 2025 inspection, Ofsted judged welfare and wellbeing to be a strong standard, the other five assessed areas to meet the expected standard, and safeguarding standards to be met. The important reservations concerned giving children time to answer and matching school preparation to their development. Those points matter alongside the positive account of relationships and everyday independence.
The early years foundation stage provides the framework for children's learning, development and care: in everyday terms, play and practical experiences help children build language, physical skills and relationships. For children aged three and above, Cedartree's learning emphasis includes communication, movement, social development, literacy, numeracy, creative expression and understanding the world.
In December 2025, staff linked activities to children's interests rather than treating each experience as an isolated task. Counting pom-poms introduced mathematical language; drawing related patterns then gave children an opportunity to practise controlling crayons. The connection between talking, counting and making marks gave a simple activity several purposes.
Stories also became opportunities to think ahead. Children anticipated which animal a mouse might encounter, then explored the story through role play. Balancing on beams added a physical challenge. These were concrete ways to practise prediction, coordination and persistence, rather than school preparation consisting solely of formal tasks.
The limitations were equally specific. In December 2025, some activities intended to prepare children for school exceeded their developmental stage. Adults also sometimes moved through questions too quickly, leaving too little thinking time. An engaging activity still needs the right level of challenge and room for the child to respond.
Outdoor experiences extended beyond exercise in December 2025. Children searched for insects, compared the feel of bark and leaves, and investigated changes in shadows. Staff used what children noticed as material for conversation. This gave language a purpose: describing something that had caught their attention.
Daily outdoor opportunities included park walks and using large play equipment. Regular shopping outings involved choosing fruit and vegetables for snacks, connecting food with the surrounding community. Neither experience depended on an elaborate resource: the practical value lay in children participating, noticing and talking.
In December 2025, familiar interests helped children settle. Penguin-related books and activities were used for a child interested in penguins, while children sought contact with their key person as they moved around the setting. Settling therefore involved both a trusted adult and something the child already enjoyed.
Communication with families covered care as well as learning. Staff discussed parents' wishes about daytime sleep, shared daily activity updates and used an online system to communicate development. That connection matters because a child's routine includes both home and preschool, rather than beginning afresh each morning.
At the December 2025 inspection, Ofsted found that developmental monitoring helped staff identify additional support needs, with language interventions supported by specialist training and cooperation with families and professionals. The account gives substance to inclusion: noticing a need, planning assistance and involving people who know the child.
Everyday care also supplied opportunities to practise independence in December 2025. Adults gave children time to attempt their coats and encouraged them to feed themselves; picture prompts helped explain handwashing and express emotions. Support was attached to ordinary moments throughout the day, making these skills useful immediately.
School preparation needed more consistent coordination. In December 2025, leaders sought feedback from Reception teachers, but did not always pass it effectively to practitioners. The resulting next step was to connect that feedback with activities suited to each child's development throughout the year.
Cedartree opens from 8.50am to 3pm. This daytime window is the practical starting point for families arranging care around work and other commitments.
The address is Jubilee Hall, Central Avenue, Sittingbourne, ME10 4BX. Preschool enquiries can be made by telephone on 07724 664 724 or by email to tetitachildcare@gmail.com.
Government-funded places are offered. Families should obtain a current written quotation for prices, so that the cost of their intended attendance can be considered alongside the opening hours.
Cedartree suits families whose childcare plans fit a daytime preschool opening window and who value learning through practical experiences. The December 2025 account offers persuasive examples: shopping for snacks, exploring outdoors and practising everyday independence. Welfare and wellbeing received the strongest area judgement.
The qualification is specific. Patient conversation and developmentally appropriate school preparation needed further attention. Families weighing this preschool should give those teaching details as much weight as its warm relationships and useful everyday experiences.
At the 3 December 2025 inspection, welfare and wellbeing met the strong standard, the other five assessed areas met the expected standard, and safeguarding standards were met. There was no overall grade.
Cedartree has 20 places in total.
In December 2025, activities connected stories, counting, drawing and physical challenges. Outdoor exploration and shopping for snack ingredients also gave children practical subjects to discuss.
Yes. Government-funded places are offered.
Cedartree opens from 8.50am to 3pm.
Get in touch with the nursery directly
Inspection outcome and judgement breakdown
FMS Inspection Score
Good
Based on 6 subcategory ratings
Ofsted Report Card
No single overall grade under the current framework
Inspected: 3 December 2025
Safeguarding standards met
Inclusion
Expected standard
Achievement
Expected standard
Behaviour, attitudes and establishing routines
Expected standard
Children's welfare and wellbeing
Strong standard
Curriculum and teaching
Expected standard
Leadership and governance
Expected standard
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted. Always refer to the official Ofsted report for the full picture of a setting’s inspection outcome.
Other nurseries and nursery schools close to this profile.
Swale, ME10 4PL
Kent council
Sessional day care
0.1 mi away
Swale, ME10 1AR
Kent council
Full day care
0.2 mi away
Swale, ME10 1AN
Kent council
Full day care
0.3 mi away
Swale, ME10 1JB
Kent council
Sessional day care
0.3 mi away
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including Ofsted early years registration and inspection data, local authority records, and the setting’s own published material.
FMS Inspection Scores and any assessment on this page are derived from that data using our own methodologies. They are our independent analysis and are not official Ofsted ratings or standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Places, opening arrangements, session patterns, funding eligibility, and fees change without notice, and the nursery and/or local authority should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular nursery, and scores reflect specific inspection evidence rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.