Quality of education
Good
The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Last reviewed: October 2026 · Inspection data and key information above update regularly, however, this review below is refreshed bi-annually and may not reflect recent changes. Contact the nursery directly to confirm current arrangements. If you spot anything outdated or inaccurate, please let us know.
A large seesaw, songs with actions and children pouring their own drinks give Beck Row Pre-School’s February 2025 daily life a practical, playful character. Small tasks mattered alongside play: choosing snacks, washing hands and helping put toys away gave children opportunities to practise independence.
At its February 2025 inspection, Ofsted rated the pre-school Good, judged safeguarding effective and found that children with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) were included in learning and made good progress. The setting has 26 places in total; children attending at that visit were aged two to four.
In February 2025, learning combined conversation, movement and hands-on activity. The early years foundation stage sets requirements for children’s learning, development and care: here, its everyday expression included stories, singing, counting and opportunities to practise physical skills.
Chinese New Year lantern-making introduced a celebration through craft, while Valentine’s Day activities involved drawing and attaching hearts to plates. Conversations about shapes, colours, sizes and quantities brought mathematical ideas into the activity. Children also practised recognising and writing their names, linking play with early literacy.
Physical play worked at different scales. In February 2025, magnetic toys exercised fingers and hands; outdoors, climbing apparatus and the large seesaw offered balance and shared play. A routine gave all children outdoor time, although moving between inside and outside needed clearer organisation.
In February 2025, staff adapted the environment to children’s interests, including a space for children who enjoyed emptying containers. Stories, singing, signs and clear spoken language supported communication. Staff listened to children as well as talking to them, giving conversation room to develop.
A sand timer helped children understand turn-taking. Staff encouraged kindness and explained boundaries, including walking indoors. These were concrete ways to make expectations understandable during play.
In February 2025, staff shared information regularly with parents and worked with them when children needed additional help. Safety arrangements included removing small objects where a child might mouth them and close supervision during meals. Staff and parents also worked together on healthy food and snacks.
The address is Lamble Close, Beck Row, Bury St. Edmunds, IP28 8AF.
In February 2025, the pre-school operated Monday to Friday in term time, with sessions running from 8.45am to 3pm. That timetable placed attendance within a term-time pattern rather than a year-round routine.
At that date, funded early education was provided for eligible children. Eligibility remains a condition of that offer.
Beck Row’s February 2025 picture suits families seeking term-time preschool sessions, with practical independence, communication and shared physical play prominent in the day. The Good judgement gives a positive dated assessment, while the need to improve routine transitions supplies a specific point to explore. The strongest detail is the everyday learning: a drink poured independently, a turn timed fairly and a craft activity made into a conversation about numbers.
Ofsted rated it Good at the inspection on 13 February 2025. Safeguarding arrangements were effective; the improvement point concerned managing routine transitions more clearly.
Children attending in February 2025 were aged two to four. The setting has 26 places in total.
Children made Chinese New Year lanterns and Valentine’s Day heart crafts, practised recognising their names and used magnetic toys. Outdoor play included climbing apparatus and a large seesaw.
In February 2025, it provided funded early education for eligible children.
Sessions ran from 8.45am to 3pm, Monday to Friday during term time.
Get in touch with the nursery directly
Inspection outcome and judgement breakdown
FMS Inspection Score
Good
Based on 4 subcategory ratings
Official Ofsted Grade
Good
Inspected: 13 February 2025
Safeguarding: Yes
Quality of education
Good
Behaviour and attitudes
Good
Personal development
Good
Effectiveness of leadership and management
Good
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted. Always refer to the official Ofsted report for the full picture of a setting’s inspection outcome.
Other nurseries and nursery schools close to this profile.
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including Ofsted early years registration and inspection data, local authority records, and the setting’s own published material.
FMS Inspection Scores and any assessment on this page are derived from that data using our own methodologies. They are our independent analysis and are not official Ofsted ratings or standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Places, opening arrangements, session patterns, funding eligibility, and fees change without notice, and the nursery and/or local authority should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular nursery, and scores reflect specific inspection evidence rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.