The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Nursery at Central Community Nursery School
Last reviewed: October 2026 · Inspection data and key information above update regularly, however, this review below is refreshed bi-annually and may not reflect recent changes. Contact the nursery directly to confirm current arrangements. If you spot anything outdated or inaccurate, please let us know.
Stories, songs and outdoor climbing featured in children’s day at Central Community Nursery School during the 2026 inspection, but serious safety concerns dominate the decision for parents. Ofsted’s report dated 3 February 2026 states that safeguarding standards were not met and that the school requires special measures. Those findings demand close attention before choosing this provision.
The nursery school is based on Nuns Street in Derby. At the 2026 inspection, the school was registered to accept children aged two to five; admitting children under two breached that registration. The inspection’s February 2026 pupil count was 100, a roll figure rather than a measure of available places.
In the 2026 inspection findings, a Hello song began each session. Together Time brought children together for stories, singing and rhymes, including Wind the Bobbin Up. Children also enjoyed performing the currant bun song. These shared activities gave them opportunities to listen, contribute familiar words and join actions with their peers.
Practical experiences observed during that inspection connected movement with language. Pouring cereal in a Goldilocks activity encouraged careful control, while stirring custard gave staff a chance to introduce descriptive vocabulary. Basic number knowledge and larger body movements also featured in the curriculum. Outside, climbing equipment gave children opportunities to test their physical confidence.
The quality of learning was uneven in the 2026 findings. Some activities sustained children’s concentration, but others had an unclear learning purpose. Staff did not consistently understand the knowledge children needed next or recognise who needed more practice. Less confident children could miss the conversations that helped their peers, and some disadvantaged children made insufficient progress with vocabulary.
Trips included a beach and a cathedral, alongside visits to an allotment. However, these experiences lacked a clear sequence for developing knowledge, and opportunities to build individual interests in music, sport and the arts were insufficient. Acting leaders had begun revising both the curriculum and personal development programme; their full effect had yet to be established.
Warm relationships were a strength in the inspection findings. Many children settled happily, and staff, including key persons, helped with worries. Children practised independence through toileting, while snacks and lunch provided opportunities to discuss healthy food. Staff also taught friendship, choices, different religions and recognising risks when climbing or using the internet.
Support for children with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) was mixed. Acting leaders and external partners had strengthened provision for children with education, health and care plans, helping them participate alongside peers. Work with other agencies supported this provision. However, some children’s learning gaps remained poorly understood, and barriers affecting vulnerable children were not identified or checked carefully enough.
Safeguarding. Staff knowledge, record keeping, referrals and governance oversight had serious weaknesses. Responsibilities concerning choking, abuse between children and concerns about another adult were not sufficiently understood. Incomplete records and delayed information sharing added to the risk. Parents need to weigh these findings alongside the positive relationships.
Behaviour and attendance. Expectations varied between staff, some children disengaged from activities, and behaviour concerns were inadequately recorded. Attendance checks and follow-up were also insufficient. Consistent routines and prompt responses to absence were required improvements, alongside stronger leadership knowledge, staff development and scrutiny by governors. Inspectors also found improvement too dependent on external support and broader leadership expertise unproven.
Nursery attendance does not guarantee a Reception place. Families must make a separate Reception application through the normal admissions process.
Preparation for that next stage also depends on the nursery experience. Poor attendance affected children’s readiness, while some vulnerable children were not receiving the help they needed before starting school. Better identification of learning needs, more consistent participation and clearer teaching of vocabulary were therefore material priorities.
The address is 43 Nuns Street, Derby, DE1 3LR, and the school’s telephone number is 01332342647.
Age eligibility. The inspection identified registration for ages two to five and a breach involving younger children. Families considering provision for a child under two should treat that regulatory finding as a significant part of their decision.
The 2026 inspection states that registration covered children aged two to five. Admitting younger children breached that registration.
The report dated 3 February 2026 states that safeguarding standards were not met. It identifies serious weaknesses in staff knowledge, records, information sharing and oversight, and states that special measures are required.
Examples recorded in the 2026 inspection included Together Time stories and songs, cereal pouring, custard stirring and outdoor climbing. The report also described trips to a beach and a cathedral, alongside allotment visits.
Acting leaders and external partners had strengthened support for children with education, health and care plans. However, some children’s learning gaps and barriers affecting vulnerable children remained insufficiently understood.
No. Families must apply separately for Reception through the normal admissions process.