Last reviewed: August 2026 · Rankings and key information above update regularly, however, this review below is refreshed bi-annually and may not reflect recent changes. If you spot anything outdated or inaccurate, please let us know.
Not an exam factory, but a small specialist school for young people for whom an ordinary classroom timetable has stopped working. Releasing Potential School serves students aged 11 to 18 across Hampshire and West Sussex, with a current whole-school roll of 40 and a capacity of 50. Every student has an education, health and care plan, and the September 2025 Ofsted inspection judged the school Good in every graded area, including its sixth-form provision.
The defining idea is simple but consequential: academic learning sits alongside outdoor education, practical skills, therapeutic support and close adult relationships. Students work through Functional Skills, vocational qualifications and personalised goals, rather than being fitted into a conventional GCSE-led model. For a family seeking a carefully tailored placement for a young person with social, emotional and mental health needs, that is the point of the school. The main question is whether its specialist referral and funding route fits the student’s plan.
Releasing Potential is built for students who have often had a difficult relationship with school. All students have EHC plans, while many have previously experienced disrupted education or low attendance. That context matters. This is not a small independent school offering a more intimate version of mainstream secondary education. It is a specialist setting designed to rebuild attendance, trust, learning habits and a sense of direction.
Its public language is rooted in William Glasser’s Choice Theory. Love, Fun, Freedom, Survival and Power are the five needs named by the school, and they provide a useful clue to the daily approach. Staff are expected to make learning meaningful, flexible and connected to individual goals. The inspected curriculum was sequenced and tailored to starting points, with outdoor education woven through it. That combination gives students more than a quiet place to complete work. It gives a route back into participation.
The head of school is Olly Parker, who joined Releasing Potential in 2024. His remit is centred on progression pathways for students with additional needs. Leadership is supported by a governing body with responsibility for oversight of standards, alongside the charity’s trustee structure. Refined monitoring systems are still becoming embedded across the school. Families should see that as a live management task, rather than a reason to discount the school’s clear specialist focus.
Size is one of the school’s practical strengths. With 40 students across the whole school, individual needs are unlikely to be lost in a large year cohort. The school’s Engage provision runs in small groups at a published two students to one staff member. One-to-one mentoring is also part of the model, on or off site. For students who find a busy peer group, long corridor changes or an impersonal timetable hard to manage, the promise is not merely smaller classes. It is an education built around sustained adult knowledge of the student.
Conventional GCSE and A-level ranking data are not available for Releasing Potential School, and that is a significant limitation for families who need a headline comparison with other secondaries. It is also an incomplete way to judge this setting. The school’s curriculum is designed around Functional Skills, vocational progress and EHC-plan targets for a very small cohort with complex starting points. A league-table reading would miss the work of restoring engagement, attendance and practical confidence.
The published qualification offer is concrete. English and Mathematics run through NCFE Functional Skills from Entry Level 1 to Level 2. Students can also work towards NCFE Food Studies, Exercise Studies, Outdoor Education and Personal & Social Development, alongside ASDAN Employability and ASDAN Personal & Social Effectiveness. Those are qualifications with a practical destination: strengthening numeracy and communication, recording work-readiness, and building evidence of skills that students can use at college, in training or with an employer.
The school reports that, in its last academic year, three students achieved Level 2 Mathematics and three achieved Level 2 English. These are small numbers, so they should not be stretched into a school-wide performance rate. They do, however, show that Level 2 accreditation is within reach for some students on the programme. Parents should ask how their child’s starting point translates into a qualification pathway, which units are realistic this year and how progress towards the EHC plan will be measured alongside certificates.
Progress is not left entirely to a final qualification. The school’s approach describes a six-week assessment at the start of a student’s journey, then tuition, mentoring, targeted intervention, group activity and post-16 transition work. Its SHAPE booklets make targets visible to staff and pupils. That matters because students who have been out of education may need early, practical evidence that effort leads somewhere before formal accreditation becomes motivating.
Teaching here is intentionally broader than desk-based subject delivery. English, Maths, Food studies, Outdoor Education and Personal & Social Development form the stated core, while the curriculum connects Functional Skills with real-world application. Food studies can support cooking, nutrition and independent-living preparation. Outdoor Education is used for challenge, teamwork and confidence. Personal & Social Development brings emotional intelligence and social skills into the working week. Each strand has a clear implication: students practise the capabilities that help them manage adult life, not just a paper qualification.
The sequence changes with age. Years 7 to 9 are directed towards Entry Level qualifications, Years 10 and 11 towards Level 1, and Years 12 and 13 towards Level 2. That is a more realistic scaffold than expecting every student to move through an identical GCSE route. It makes the next step visible, particularly for students whose confidence has been damaged by repeated failure in conventional assessment.
Reading and communication receive specific attention. Students at early stages of reading use a phonics scheme, while adults identify knowledge gaps in ways that reduce the barrier created by formal assessment activities. The school has also broken down EHC-plan targets and uses them alongside curriculum goals. The limitation is equally specific: in some lessons, staff did not yet consistently adapt learning so that those two sets of goals could be met together. Families should ask what adaptation looks like in the subjects their child will study, and how teachers and mentors share that plan.
The post-16 offer follows the same pattern. Students aged 16 to 19 continue English and Maths, develop employability skills, take part in work-experience opportunities and follow personal-development programmes. This is not an A-level sixth form, so it will not suit a student seeking a broad academic A-level menu. For a young person who needs a bridge from specialist secondary education to training, college or work, its combination of Functional Skills, ASDAN Employability and supported placements is far more relevant.
The subject mix also leaves room for a different kind of achievement. A student may be working on functional communication in English, then applying number skills in a practical context, then recording progress through ASDAN or a Level 1 NCFE course. That does not make academic learning secondary. It gives it an applied purpose. Families should ask to see a sample weekly plan for the proposed group, including how English and Maths are timetabled, what evidence will be collected for qualifications, and how outdoor sessions connect back to the student’s learning targets.
The school’s destination work is practical and personalised. Students in Years 9 to 13 can access work-placement opportunities in real businesses, and post-16 students may continue with extended placements. Students in the post-16 provision complete an employability qualification while gaining work experience in the printshop. That is useful preparation for a young person who needs to practise punctuality, communication and sustained responsibility before moving to a larger college or employer.
Preparation starts before the final year. The school’s published pathway includes work placements, mentoring and a transition focus. Families are invited into annual EHC-plan reviews and termly target-setting meetings, giving parents a formal point to discuss college, training, employment or a continuing sixth-form placement. The school also says students leaving are supported to choose next provision, including local further-education colleges or its own sixth form, with supported open days and interviews where appropriate.
There is no published university-destination series, Oxbridge record or Russell Group percentage, and those are not sensible measures for the core offer here. More useful questions are specific: has the student achieved the literacy and numeracy level required by a preferred college course, what work experience is available, and who will coordinate the transition plan? The evidence points to a school that treats progression as readiness for education or employment, not a single destination ladder.
Admissions are specialised and placement-led. Students are referred by Hampshire or West Sussex local authorities, and placements are commonly funded by those authorities. The school’s current FAQ adds that referrals are usually made by a local authority, while private placements can also be considered. This is therefore not an open-enrolment independent school with a published entrance exam or a standard Year 7 application deadline.
The transition process is deliberate. The school describes staff visits after a referral, parent and student visits to the school, a home visit before a place is taken up, and a phased induction for students joining mid-year when needed. It also requests an information passport from the previous school and receives the EHC plan and other relevant information before admission. That is substantial preparation, and it matters because a rushed move can undo trust for students whose attendance and engagement have already been fragile.
Parents should begin with the local authority SEND team and the annual review process if the student has an EHC plan. Ask whether Releasing Potential is named in the plan, whether the placement can meet the specified provision, which site and learning pattern are proposed, and what transport arrangements apply. Suitability, funding and the ability to meet need are the decisive questions.
The age range is 11 to 18, but the pathway is not tied to a single annual entry point. A student joining after a difficult period away from education may need a phased start, whereas another may be ready to begin small-group learning more quickly. That flexibility is a positive when transition has to be managed carefully. It also makes the initial placement conversation more detailed than a standard school application. Families should bring the current EHC plan, recent attendance information, reports that explain what has helped or hindered engagement, and a clear picture of the student’s ambitions after school.
Relationships are the engine of the pastoral offer. Positive staff-student relationships build trust, knowledge, skills and confidence. Students feel safe, understand online and real-world safety, and learn within a calm environment with high expectations for behaviour. This gives parents a useful picture: the school is not permissive because it is specialist. Routines, reward and consistency still matter.
Attendance is treated as an educational priority. The school was alert to students who had struggled to attend previous settings and worked to build productive habits for regular attendance. That is a meaningful focus for this intake. A student can only benefit from a tailored curriculum, a work placement or Outdoor Education if they can return consistently enough for adults to build on previous learning.
Personal development is structured rather than left to occasional conversations. The school runs a personal and social development programme focused on resilience, determination and independence, while careers work helps students identify realistic next steps. In practice, that sits alongside rewards, clear routines and the opportunity to have achievements recognised. For families, the important test is whether these systems help their child regulate, engage and recover after a difficult day, not whether they resemble the pastoral structures of a larger mainstream school.
Families have several planned contact points. Parents can meet staff termly at target-setting and review meetings, receive written termly reports covering academic subjects, attendance and behaviour, and attend the annual EHC-plan review. Tutors also give regular updates. That structure connects the personal plan to day-to-day evidence, so a parent can see whether a concern is about learning, attendance, regulation, peer relationships or a change in routine.
Safeguarding was effective at the September 2025 inspection. The school’s public FAQ also describes tutors as responsible for individual wellbeing, with access to advice and support from counselling services, Education Welfare, CAMHS and Social Care where appropriate. Because each student’s provision is individual, families should ask which member of staff will be their named day-to-day contact, how communication is managed when a student is off site, and how the school responds to a rise in anxiety or non-attendance.
Outdoor Education is not an optional add-on. It is one of the school’s core curriculum subjects and learning outside is pivotal to the school’s success. Students spend a significant part of many days off site in outdoor activities, using challenge and practical responsibility to support confidence, teamwork and relationships. The implication is powerful for the right student: learning can regain relevance when it happens through doing, not only through written tasks.
That learning has real sites behind it. Releasing Potential lists the Sailing Centre at Northney Marina, Willow Farm, Outdoor Living Woodland at Stansted House and Emsworth Alternative Provision, as well as school sites in Havant and Chichester. Students can use Willow Farm, Emsworth Outdoors and Sailing Centre with school staff. A parent should ask which locations apply to their child’s proposed programme, how frequently travel occurs and what a typical off-site day requires from the student.
The Duke of Edinburgh Award is a further pillar. Residential adventure trips are arranged in Year 11 through the award or the wider outdoor curriculum, and students work towards Duke of Edinburgh’s awards. This is more than a trip calendar. It gives students a structured way to practise resilience, shared responsibility and completing a demanding commitment, with a recognised outcome attached.
Practical learning also reaches into trades and work. On-site opportunities include basics of brick laying and mechanics, as well as cookery competitions. Post-16 students have experience in the printshop while completing employability work. NCFE Food Studies, NCFE Exercise Studies and NCFE Outdoor Education add credentials to that practical learning. For students who have disengaged from abstract lessons, the school’s strength is this repeated connection between a task, a visible skill and a potential next step.
This is an independent school, but the usual independent-school fee comparison does not fit neatly. The school’s public information says local authorities usually make referrals and fund or part-fund placements, while private placements may be considered. Its current pages do not set out a public fee schedule, registration charge, acceptance deposit, bursary policy or scholarship programme.
For families considering a private placement, the useful action is to request a written placement proposal that sets out the cost, the educational package, any therapy or outdoor-learning elements, transport responsibility and the review arrangements. For local-authority-funded placements, the key document is the EHC plan and its specified provision. Do not assume that a historical fee or another family’s arrangement will apply to a new placement.
Fees data coming soon.
The school publishes a Monday to Friday school day of 09:30 to 14:30, with wider opening times of 08:30 to 16:30. It operates from Havant and Chichester, while programmes may also use the organisation’s outdoor and alternative-provision sites. Transport arrangements are individual and should be confirmed as part of the referral or placement discussion.
The published 2025-26 term dates run through to Wednesday 22 July 2026. Families considering a future placement should request the current calendar, induction pattern and site timetable directly, especially where off-site education or a phased start is proposed.
Daily logistics deserve the same attention as curriculum. A student may learn at the Havant or Chichester school site and spend time at an outdoor or alternative-provision location. Ask who meets the student at each point of the day, what clothing or equipment is required for outdoor learning, how attendance is recorded off site and whether the proposed timetable can be increased gradually. Those details determine whether a carefully designed placement is manageable at home as well as at school.
Specialist remit. Every student has an EHC plan, and the offer is designed for young people who have found mainstream education difficult. It is best considered through SEND planning and suitability, not as a general alternative to a mainstream independent secondary.
Qualification route. Functional Skills, NCFE and ASDAN qualifications are central, while conventional GCSE and A-level outcome data are not available. Families seeking a traditional exam programme should establish whether the stated pathway matches the student’s next destination.
Consistency of adaptation. Teaching was Good overall, but staff did not always adapt learning to meet EHC-plan targets alongside curriculum objectives. Ask how the school will translate a particular plan into classroom, mentoring and off-site learning.
Funding and costs. Local-authority funding is common and private placements are considered, but there is no current public fee schedule. Secure a written proposal before making decisions about a private placement.
Releasing Potential School is a focused specialist provision, not a conventional small independent school. Its most persuasive features are the close adult support, structured transition, Functional Skills and vocational pathways, outdoor learning and work-focused post-16 preparation. The Good judgement across all graded areas in September 2025 supports that picture.
It is best suited to students aged 11 to 18 with an EHC plan, particularly those whose attendance, confidence or engagement has been damaged in previous settings and who respond to practical learning alongside academic work. The main caveat is the narrowness of the offer: families wanting conventional GCSE or A-level breadth, published exam comparisons or a standard fee-and-admissions route should look elsewhere.
Yes. Its September 2025 inspection judged the school Good overall and Good across education, behaviour, personal development, leadership and sixth form. It is a specialist choice for students with EHC plans rather than a conventional academic independent school.
There is no published applications-per-place figure. Placements are usually considered through local-authority referral, the EHC plan, funding and whether the school can meet the student’s needs.
The school does not publish conventional GCSE performance data. Its academic and vocational route includes NCFE Functional Skills, NCFE Level 1 courses and ASDAN qualifications, with pathways tailored to starting points.
The school says placements are usually funded or part-funded by a local authority and that private placements can be considered. A current public fee schedule is not available, so families considering a private placement should request written costs and placement terms.
Post-16 students continue English and Maths, work on employability, take part in work experience and can study ASDAN Personal & Social Effectiveness. The inspection also records printshop work experience alongside an employability qualification.
Get in touch with the school directly
Is this your school?
Claim this profile to update contact info, add photos, and more.
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including the Department for Education (DfE), Ofsted, the Independent Schools Inspectorate (ISI), the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, and official school websites.
Our rankings, metrics, and assessments are derived from this data using our own methodologies and represent our independent analysis rather than official standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Data may change without notice, and schools and/or local authorities should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular school, and rankings reflect specific metrics rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.
