The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Last reviewed: February 2026 · Rankings and key information above update regularly, however, this review below is refreshed bi-annually and may not reflect recent changes. If you spot anything outdated or inaccurate, please let us know.
A clear set of expectations shapes daily life here, pupils talk about being ready, respectful and safe as the default, and staff reinforce it consistently. The most recent inspection paints a calm, positive picture, with warm relationships, a broad curriculum and pupils who generally achieve well.
Academically, the headline is that KS2 outcomes sit below the England average, even though some subject indicators, such as reading scaled score, are comparatively stronger. The school is oversubscribed for Reception entry on the latest application cycle so admission can still be competitive even when results are mixed. For working families, the on-site wraparound provision, plus a structured start to the school day, is a practical advantage.
Bushmead presents as a school with a defined behavioural culture, without being rigid. Pupils understand the three core values, ready, respectful and safe, and the wider climate described in external review is cheerful and good-humoured, with pupils comfortable raising worries with adults.
Support for emotional regulation is not treated as a separate add-on. The inspection report refers to The Tree House nurture provision, positioned as a place that helps some pupils build resilience and engage more reliably with learning. That matters for families whose child might need structured, predictable support during primary years, even if they do not have a formal special educational needs plan.
Leadership stability is another anchor. Mr Steve Down is named as headteacher on the school website, and governance information indicates he has served in that role since 01 September 2015.
Performance data here needs a nuanced read. In the 2025 dataset, 60% of pupils met the expected standard in reading, writing and mathematics combined. At the higher standard, no pupils were recorded as reaching greater depth in reading, writing and mathematics. Those two indicators point to a more mixed profile than the previous review suggested.
However, the school’s overall primary ranking position suggests outcomes are below the strongest profiles across the full measure used in the FindMySchool ranking system. Ranked 9,348th out of 14,978 schools in England for primary academic outcomes, with the local ranking placing it 7th in St Neots and 9,570th in England overall, this places results in the lower part of the national table on that ranking measure.
Looking at subject detail, the average scaled scores are 105 for reading, 104 for maths, and 103 for grammar, punctuation and spelling. In plain terms, reading, mathematics, and GPS are the stronger subject details in the current profile. Science sits at 80% reaching the expected standard.
The practical implication for parents is that many children will do well, but progress is likely to vary by cohort and by subject, and families considering Bushmead should pay close attention to how the school identifies gaps and responds quickly, especially in early reading and in-class support for pupils with additional needs.
England ranks and key metrics (where available)
Reading, Writing & Maths
63%
% of pupils achieving expected standard
A broad, ambitious curriculum is part of the school’s stated and externally-observed approach, with sequencing designed to help pupils build knowledge over time. The inspection narrative is clear that the curriculum structure is strongest where subject planning and checks on learning are tightly aligned. Where that alignment slips, some pupils can move on before they are fully secure, which is an issue the school has been asked to address.
Reading receives particular emphasis. Pupils are read to regularly, and Year 6 reading ambassadors are highlighted as an active part of the school’s reading culture. Early phonics is described as logical and regularly checked, with additional help provided promptly when needed. The main improvement point is ensuring that pupils who are still building phonics knowledge consistently read books matched to the sounds they have learned, so decoding remains fluent rather than frustrating.
For pupils with special educational needs and disabilities, needs are identified accurately and assessed promptly, and support can be highly effective when it is carefully tailored. The improvement request focuses on making sure classroom tasks are consistently broken down into achievable steps, with resources that precisely match need, not just in nurture settings.
Quality of Education
Good
Behaviour & Attitudes
Good
Personal Development
Good
Leadership & Management
Good
Ofsted did not issue a single overall grade for this inspection. This score is derived from the published subjudgements.
FMS Inspection Score calculated by FindMySchool based on official inspection data.
As a St Neots primary, transition is typically into local secondary provision coordinated through Cambridgeshire County Council’s admissions process and catchment areas. The council provides an interactive catchment map and guidance for researching schools, which is the most reliable way to understand likely secondary pathways from a specific address.
The school’s own focus on resilience, respectful relationships, and a structured approach to learning should support pupils moving into a larger setting, particularly those who benefit from clear routines and adults who communicate expectations plainly.
Bushmead is a community school, with Reception admissions coordinated through the local authority. For 2027 entry, the primary admissions deadline is 15 January 2027 and offer day is 16 April 2027.
Demand, based on the provided admissions results for the most recent cycle shown, indicates the school is oversubscribed, with 96 applications for 52 offers, around 1.85 applications per place. That does not guarantee the next cycle will look identical, but it does suggest families should treat entry as competitive and apply on time.
Open events are publicised for Early Years entry. Dates change year to year, so parents should check the school calendar for the most current schedule before planning a visit.
Parents comparing options should use the FindMySchool Map Search to understand how their address sits against typical allocation patterns, especially if demand remains high.
Applications
96
Total received
Places Offered
52
Subscription Rate
1.8x
Applications per place
Wellbeing provision appears embedded in daily routines rather than framed as occasional interventions. Pupils know how to raise concerns, and safeguarding is described as effective in the most recent inspection.
Online safety is part of the explicit safety curriculum, and pupils are taught how to keep themselves safe, including online. Attendance and punctuality are monitored closely, with leaders using patterns to provide targeted support to families who need guidance. This matters because, in a school where pupils revisit prior learning at the start of the day, lateness can have a direct impact on confidence and continuity.
The wider offer is not limited to standard sports and arts clubs. The inspection report references clubs including astronomy and musical theatre, alongside opportunities to compete in sporting events and perform in community events. These kinds of clubs do two useful jobs, they widen horizons for pupils who might not otherwise try niche interests, and they build confidence through performance and shared projects.
Trips are used as curriculum extensions rather than rewards. Examples referenced include visits such as theatre and seaside trips, with the broader aim of helping pupils learn about people, places, cultures and customs beyond their day-to-day experience. For families, this often signals a curriculum that tries to make knowledge concrete and memorable, especially for pupils who learn best through context and experience.
The school day begins at 08:45, with doors opening at 08:40. A short early session is used for reviewing prior learning and preparing for the day.
Wraparound care is offered via the school’s own provision. This is positioned as a mix of relaxed time and structured activities, and is likely to be a meaningful benefit for working parents who want continuity with familiar staff.
Outcomes are mixed across measures. KS2 expected standard and higher-standard figures are encouraging, but the overall ranking position used in the FindMySchool measure indicates below-average performance. This is a school to visit with questions about assessment checks and how gaps are identified early.
Oversubscription risk. Recent application data indicates more applications than offers. If Bushmead is your first choice, apply on time and have a sensible second option.
Support consistency for pupils with additional needs. Targeted support can be strong, particularly through nurture provision, but classroom scaffolding has been an identified area to tighten, especially around task breakdown and matching resources.
Reading book matching matters. Early reading teaching is structured, but book alignment to taught sounds has been highlighted as a practical improvement point for a small number of pupils.
Bushmead Primary School suits families who value a well-defined behaviour culture, a positive tone, and practical wraparound support, and who want a school that takes reading seriously and offers enriching clubs and trips. It is a sensible option for many local children, particularly those who respond well to clear routines and warm adult relationships. The key decision point is whether the academic picture, which combines some promising indicators with a below-average overall ranking position, aligns with what you want for your child.
The most recent inspection graded key areas as Good, including quality of education, behaviour and attitudes, personal development, leadership and management, and early years provision. Pupils are described as happy, with high expectations for behaviour and a broad curriculum.
In the 2025 dataset, 60% met the expected standard in reading, writing and maths combined. No pupils were recorded at the higher standard in reading, writing and maths combined. Reading and maths scaled scores were 105 and 104 respectively.
Reception applications close on 15 January 2027, with offers on 16 April 2027. Applications are made through the local authority process for community schools.
Yes. The school runs its own wraparound provision, described as before and after-school care with a mix of relaxation and activities.
Clubs referenced in external review include astronomy and musical theatre, alongside wider opportunities such as sporting events and community performance.
Get in touch with the school directly
Is this your school?
Claim this profile to update contact info, add photos, and more.
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including the Department for Education (DfE), Ofsted, the Independent Schools Inspectorate (ISI), the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, and official school websites.
Our rankings, metrics, and assessments are derived from this data using our own methodologies and represent our independent analysis rather than official standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Data may change without notice, and schools and/or local authorities should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular school, and rankings reflect specific metrics rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.
