Quality of education
Good
The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Last reviewed: October 2026 · Inspection data and key information above update regularly, however, this review below is refreshed bi-annually and may not reflect recent changes. Contact the nursery directly to confirm current arrangements. If you spot anything outdated or inaccurate, please let us know.
A separate pond area and sheltered garden tables gave StaynPlay Day Care a clear outdoor character in January 2025. At its January 2025 inspection, Ofsted rated the nursery Good, judged safeguarding effective and found that children made progress across a carefully planned curriculum.
The setting has capacity for 130 children. Its address is James Watt Close, Great Yarmouth, NR31 0NX; children attending in January 2025 ranged from birth to eight years old.
That capacity is a whole-setting figure, rather than the size of a baby's group or an older child's room. The January 2025 account brings the different stages into view through attentive responses to babies' feelings and nature exploration for older children. Those are separate experiences within the same setting.
In January 2025, older children explored nature through supervised visits to the separate pond area. Garden tables beneath shelter provided somewhere to draw, while sensory materials encouraged experimentation. Outdoor play also gave children space to develop balance, coordination and larger movements. These were useful extensions of indoor learning.
The early years foundation stage sets the requirements for children's learning, development and care. In January 2025, learning included conversations, stories, songs and practical exploration: staff introduced ideas such as animals being active at night and connected discussion to children's own experiences.
Books were also shared outdoors in a comfortable reading space. Staff selected stories and songs deliberately, giving conversation and language practice a place throughout the day.
Group conversations in January 2025 gave older children opportunities to talk about their preferences and experiences, including Halloween. Staff extended these exchanges with explanations of unfamiliar ideas, such as explaining that nocturnal animals are active at night. That example gives substance to the curriculum: children could bring something familiar to a discussion and encounter new vocabulary through it. Learning involved both listening and contributing.
Adults also joined children during garden activities and talked with them about their play. The sheltered drawing tables and sensory materials therefore supported interaction as well as independent experimentation. For a parent weighing the outdoor provision, the useful detail is how it was used: staff connected conversation to what children were doing, rather than treating time outside simply as a break from learning indoors.
At the January 2025 inspection, Ofsted found attentive care for babies, effective health and hygiene practice, and close work with parents to support children's individual development. Staff acknowledged babies' emotions and offered comfort, helping them through moments of frustration.
The January 2025 account also described babies recognising familiar routines, exploring confidently and trying out sounds and words. Their care involved adults responding to what they communicated, including impatience, rather than overlooking those signals. For parents of younger children, that is a concrete picture of interaction: familiar staff noticed feelings and responded calmly while babies experimented with communicating.
Health procedures were another part of the January 2025 account. Staff understood the policies they were expected to follow and applied them in daily care. Leadership communication included newly introduced short morning meetings, while staff had opportunities to contribute their views. These details concern the organisation behind children's day: shared information helps adults coordinate their work, alongside the direct exchanges with parents described below.
In January 2025, information gathered from parents when children started helped staff plan their care. Families received updates about care and learning and contributed to support plans. However, information from other childcare settings was not consistently sought promptly, which could delay understanding a child's needs.
James Watt Close is the nursery's Great Yarmouth address. In January 2025, it operated throughout the year, Monday to Friday, with sessions running from 7am to 7pm. Funded early education was provided for eligible children at that time.
These are dated attendance arrangements rather than a current booking commitment.
Outdoor exploration and responsive baby care were the strongest features of the January 2025 picture. It suits families who value nature-based experiences and close parental involvement. The same dated findings identify two useful decision points: flexibility during transitions and coordination when children attend another provider.
Ofsted rated it Good at its January 2025 inspection and judged safeguarding effective.
Children attending in January 2025 ranged from birth to eight years old. The setting has capacity for 130 children in total.
In January 2025, older children explored a separate pond area under direct supervision. Outdoor learning also included drawing at sheltered garden tables and practising balance and coordination.
In January 2025, the nursery provided funded early education for eligible children.
In January 2025, staff gathered information from parents when children started, shared updates about care and learning, and worked with families on individual support plans.
Get in touch with the nursery directly
Inspection outcome and judgement breakdown
FMS Inspection Score
Good
Based on 4 subcategory ratings
Official Ofsted Grade
Good
Inspected: 28 January 2025
Safeguarding: Yes
Quality of education
Good
Behaviour and attitudes
Good
Personal development
Good
Effectiveness of leadership and management
Good
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted. Always refer to the official Ofsted report for the full picture of a setting’s inspection outcome.
Other nurseries and nursery schools close to this profile.
Great Yarmouth, NR31 8AH
Norfolk council
0.6 mi away
Great Yarmouth, NR31 0LG
Norfolk council
Full day care
0.7 mi away
Great Yarmouth, NR31 6QY
Norfolk council
0.9 mi away
Great Yarmouth, NR31 8NS
Norfolk council
0.9 mi away
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including Ofsted early years registration and inspection data, local authority records, and the setting’s own published material.
FMS Inspection Scores and any assessment on this page are derived from that data using our own methodologies. They are our independent analysis and are not official Ofsted ratings or standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Places, opening arrangements, session patterns, funding eligibility, and fees change without notice, and the nursery and/or local authority should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular nursery, and scores reflect specific inspection evidence rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.