Quality of education
Good
The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Last reviewed: October 2026 · Inspection data and key information above update regularly, however, this review below is refreshed bi-annually and may not reflect recent changes. Contact the nursery directly to confirm current arrangements. If you spot anything outdated or inaccurate, please let us know.
Water experiments, outdoor games and daily yoga give K E S Childcare's June 2025 nursery day a practical, active character. Based at Kingstone High School in Kingstone, Hereford, the setting accepts children aged 20 to 60 months.
At its June 2025 inspection, Ofsted judged the provision Good, found children making good progress and assessed safeguarding as effective. The most useful detail lies beneath that judgement: activities were shaped around children's interests and next steps, with stories, movement and hands-on exploration doing much of the teaching.
The early years foundation stage sets the requirements for children's learning and care, bringing play and development together. In June 2025, staff used what they knew about individual children's abilities to choose activities that moved their learning forward.
Stories and action rhymes encouraged listening and vocabulary. Coloured rice, water and sand gave children textures to investigate, while adults introduced words for quantities during play. The water tray also became a place for preschool children to predict which objects would float or sink. These were concrete ways to connect language, mathematics and investigation.
Outdoor play brought cooperation into the same picture. Children worked together on a game involving large counters, practising turn-taking and thinking through their next moves. Staff had also revisited their mathematics teaching following training, connecting professional development to everyday activities.
At the June 2025 inspection, Ofsted found that children with special educational needs and/or disabilities made good progress through tailored plans developed with parents, health visitors and the local authority inclusion team. That gives families a concrete account of how additional support worked, rather than a general promise of inclusion.
In June 2025, daily yoga gave children opportunities to practise balance and strength and to relax. Personal care was handled gently, with handwashing encouraged and outdoor safety explained through sunscreen and sunhats. Teeth and online safety needed more attention, however, and both became improvement priorities.
Communication extended beyond brief conversations: staff spoke with parents at collection and drop-off and supplied progress reports each term. For children approaching school, teachers visited the nursery and received information about individual needs. Meeting a future teacher in familiar surroundings helped make the change less abrupt.
The address is Kingstone High School, Kingstone, Hereford, HR2 9HJ. In June 2025, the setting's session window ran from 7am to 6pm, Monday to Friday; it operated throughout the year apart from a Christmas closure lasting one week. These are the arrangements at that inspection date.
At the same date, funded early education was provided for children aged two to four. Funding participation is useful for families weighing childcare costs, but eligibility and the attendance arrangement still matter to the individual booking.
K E S Childcare suits families who value practical play, regular movement and individual planning, with the June 2025 account providing concrete examples of each. Its work with visiting teachers and additional-support professionals also gives substance to care beyond daily activities. The balance is positive, with clear improvement priorities around dental care and digital safety.
Ofsted rated it Good in June 2025, with effective safeguarding and good progress for children.
The setting accepts children aged 20 to 60 months.
In June 2025, children explored textures, tested objects in water, joined stories and action rhymes, and cooperated in outdoor games.
In June 2025, it provided funded early education for children aged two to four.
In June 2025, staff combined conversations at drop-off and collection with written progress reports each term.
Closed: Bank Holidays, Christmas & 1 week in the summer holidays
Get in touch with the nursery directly
Inspection outcome and judgement breakdown
FMS Inspection Score
Good
Based on 4 subcategory ratings
Official Ofsted Grade
Good
Inspected: 13 June 2025
Safeguarding: Yes
Quality of education
Good
Behaviour and attitudes
Good
Personal development
Good
Effectiveness of leadership and management
Good
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted. Always refer to the official Ofsted report for the full picture of a setting’s inspection outcome.
Other nurseries and nursery schools close to this profile.
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including Ofsted early years registration and inspection data, local authority records, and the setting’s own published material.
FMS Inspection Scores and any assessment on this page are derived from that data using our own methodologies. They are our independent analysis and are not official Ofsted ratings or standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Places, opening arrangements, session patterns, funding eligibility, and fees change without notice, and the nursery and/or local authority should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular nursery, and scores reflect specific inspection evidence rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.