Day Nursery

1st Steps Day Nursery

Eastbrook School, Dagenham Road, Dagenham, RM10 7UR·Barking and Dagenham council·Ofsted URN: 2707918
Full day care
Day Nursery
3 months to 5 years
64 places
18 childcare staff
Registered 5 Oct 2022
Early Years Register
FMS Inspection Score
Good
7/10
Nursery official?Claim Profile

Last reviewed: July 2026 · Inspection data and key information above update regularly, however, this review below is refreshed bi-annually and may not reflect recent changes. Contact the nursery directly to confirm current arrangements. If you spot anything outdated or inaccurate, please let us know.

1st Steps Day Nursery

At a Glance

Warm relationships and purposeful play define the strongest evidence for 1st Steps Day Nursery. The setting, at Eastbrook School on Dagenham Road, cares for children from three months to five years and has capacity for 64 children. Ofsted judged it Good in February 2025, with effective safeguarding and Good judgements across education, behaviour and attitudes, personal development, and leadership and management.

The inspection found children settling quickly, choosing experiences independently and receiving challenge from staff who knew their key children well. Communication runs through the day: conversation, imaginative play, sign language and new vocabulary all contributed to children's learning.

The Nursery Experience

The Early Years Foundation Stage sets the areas of learning and development that shape children's days, from communication and physical development to early mathematics and understanding the world. It means play, conversation and adult-guided experiences are used to build knowledge and skills towards the next stage, rather than children following a school-style timetable. In February 2025, staff turned those areas into practical experiences. Children used tools to release objects frozen in ice, persisting and solving problems, while timers helped them take turns.

A flower-shop activity combined language and mathematics: staff introduced flower names, children counted play money, and simple addition continued at snack time. Children could also look at the staff board and discuss whom they wanted to play with that day. These details point to a day where choice sits alongside deliberate teaching. Staff created experiences intended to capture imagination and curiosity, and children moved independently around the room to select what they wanted to do.

The balance was not perfect. Shared activities did not consistently engage children at every developmental stage. That finding matters because a well-planned activity still has limited value if younger children or those at another stage cannot remain involved.

Care and Support

Key-person knowledge was a clear strength at the February 2025 inspection. Practitioners combined observations of each child with family conversations to decide what support and challenge should come next. Families also praised flexible, individual settling arrangements and communication about learning.

That combination gives parents two useful lines of sight. Staff were using what they knew about each child to plan challenge, rather than treating observation as paperwork, and families were kept informed about learning. The inspection also recorded that staff felt supported through meetings, supervision, appraisal and further training opportunities. A supported team does not guarantee continuity, but those structures give practitioners regular space to review their work and development.

Support for children with SEND was judged excellent. Staff worked closely with parents, made timely referrals and delivered individual interventions. At the February 2025 inspection, safeguarding arrangements were effective, supported by an open culture centred on children's interests.

Food was freshly prepared by an on-site chef at the time of the inspection. Ofsted also identified an inconsistency: children returning to food after playing with soil or dough were not always asked to wash their hands again.

Practical Information

The nursery is based at Eastbrook School, Dagenham Road, Dagenham RM10 7UR. The official record covers children from three months to five years and gives the setting capacity for 64 places.

Things to Consider

  • Group activities. Ofsted asked the nursery to tailor group activities more closely to differing needs because some children lost interest. Families should explore how staff now adapt shared activities for different ages and stages.
  • Hand hygiene. The February 2025 inspection found that handwashing before returning to food was not consistently reinforced after soil or dough play. Parents may want to discuss the routine now used between messy play and meals.
  • Attendance pattern. Ask whether the required full-day or half-day pattern can be booked and establish the exact weekly commitment during an enquiry before making plans around work.

The Verdict

1st Steps Day Nursery's strongest case rests on warm key-person relationships, purposeful language work and practical problem-solving. Tailored interventions add substance for families seeking SEND support. Its Good inspection outcome is positive, but the two improvement points matter: group teaching needs to hold every child's attention, and hygiene routines must be consistent. It best suits families who value individual settling and learning built through conversation, choice and hands-on experiences, whether they need a full-day or half-day arrangement, once the required pattern has been agreed directly.

FAQs

Ofsted judged the nursery Good in February 2025. The inspection found safeguarding effective, and education, behaviour and attitudes, personal development, and leadership and management were all judged Good.

The official record covers children from three months to five years. The setting has capacity for 64 children.

The February 2025 inspection highlighted language-rich play, practical problem-solving, strong key-person knowledge and individual SEND interventions.

Parents praised flexible, individual settling arrangements at the February 2025 inspection, while staff's knowledge of their key children supported continuity of care.

Families should establish whether the full-day or half-day pattern they need can be booked and agree any minimum weekly commitment during an enquiry.

Opening Hours

Fri
07:30-18:30
Mon
07:30-18:30
Tue
07:30-18:30
Thu
07:30-18:30
Wed
07:30-18:30
Opening schedule
Open all year
Full days
Available
Half-day sessions
Offered

Contact Information

Get in touch with the nursery directly

Eastbrook School, Dagenham Road, Dagenham, RM10 7UR

Manager

Joy Pope (Owner/Manager)

Ofsted Inspection

Inspection outcome and judgement breakdown

7/10

FMS Inspection Score

Good

Based on 4 subcategory ratings

Official Ofsted Grade

Good

Inspected: 18 February 2025

Safeguarding: Yes

Inspection History

18 Feb 2025Most recent full inspectionGood

Inspection Judgements

Quality of education

Good

Behaviour and attitudes

Good

Personal development

Good

Effectiveness of leadership and management

Good

Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted. Always refer to the official Ofsted report for the full picture of a setting’s inspection outcome.

Disclaimer

Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including Ofsted early years registration and inspection data, local authority records, and the setting’s own published material.

FMS Inspection Scores and any assessment on this page are derived from that data using our own methodologies. They are our independent analysis and are not official Ofsted ratings or standings.

While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Places, opening arrangements, session patterns, funding eligibility, and fees change without notice, and the nursery and/or local authority should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.

FindMySchool does not endorse any particular nursery, and scores reflect specific inspection evidence rather than overall quality.

To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.