Quality of education
Good
The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Last reviewed: October 2026 · Inspection data and key information above update regularly, however, this review below is refreshed bi-annually and may not reflect recent changes. Contact the nursery directly to confirm current arrangements. If you spot anything outdated or inaccurate, please let us know.
Conversation, signing and help with emotions give Rising Stars its clearest character. At its January 2025 inspection, Ofsted judged the nursery Good overall and safeguarding effective. The setting has capacity for 35 children at Prospect Hall in Woodford Green.
The strongest detail concerns everyday interaction: adults giving children time to answer, helping them express feelings and supporting communication before speech develops. These are practical considerations for families weighing how their child will be understood.
In January 2025, children had space for play both outside and indoors, with resources supporting different activities. The early years foundation stage sets the framework for learning, development and care: here, the inspection-era examples included learning through stories, conversation and play.
Sand-based mark making gave children practice with hand control, while stories introduced animals and their habitats. Action songs brought counting into shared play. Adults paired spoken language with signs for children who were not yet talking, giving them another way to communicate.
There were two clear teaching limitations. Larger gatherings sometimes left less confident children unable to participate fully. Adults also missed opportunities to connect children's own discoveries with earlier learning. The distinction matters: engaging activities need both room for individual contributions and conversations that take an idea further.
The January 2025 examples also included circle time, where children practised attending to others, and a home corner that introduced healthy eating through fruit and vegetables. These gave learning different settings: a shared gathering for listening, and pretend play for exploring everyday choices. The concern about larger groups qualifies that picture. An activity could have a clear educational purpose while still leaving a quieter child with too little opportunity to join in.
Social learning ran through play in January 2025. Children practised sharing resources and waiting for a turn, while adults sustained exchanges rather than simply giving instructions. For parents, that detail connects communication with relationships: speaking, listening and playing together were parts of the same experience. Signs alongside speech also made the language support relevant to children at an earlier stage of communication. The examples describe adult involvement as well as the materials children used.
At the January 2025 inspection, Ofsted found that assessment identified learning gaps promptly, external help was sought without delay, and funded support included specialist speech and language training that helped children with SEND progress quickly. This gives families a concrete picture of the support mechanisms operating at that time.
Everyday care in January 2025 included patient responses, comfort when children sought it and resources for recognising feelings. Staff supported toilet independence and explained handwashing through what happens to germs. These routines connected care with children learning to manage their own needs.
Communication with families covered development and next steps. Monthly supervision gave staff opportunities to discuss practice and concerns; leaders also worked alongside practitioners and accessed local-authority training. That combination put professional discussion close to children's daily experiences.
The January 2025 account of personal care included attention to cleanliness as well as children's independence. Toilet learning involved adult guidance, while handwashing came with an explanation children could understand. These are small routines with a practical purpose: children were learning what to do and why, rather than being expected to manage self-care unaided.
Staff development was another part of the January 2025 picture. Practitioners described regular training in children's development, and the inspection connected this support with continuity and motivation within the team. Alongside monthly supervision, this provided opportunities to develop knowledge and discuss difficulties. For families, the relevant detail is the connection between staff support and daily practice: leaders spent time working with practitioners, bringing their guidance into the rooms where children played.
The address is Prospect Hall, 28-42 Prospect Road, Woodford Green, IG8 7NA. Opening hours are 7.30am to 6.30pm, Monday to Friday, with an all-year opening schedule. This broad weekday window is a useful practical consideration for working families.
Rising Stars suits families who value patient interaction, communication support and weekday opening hours extending into the early evening. Its January 2025 strengths were rooted in everyday care and targeted support. Participation in larger groups and deeper follow-up of children's ideas remain the two teaching points to weigh alongside those strengths.
Ofsted rated Rising Stars Good overall on 17 January 2025 and found safeguarding effective.
It has capacity for 35 children in total.
In January 2025, examples included making marks in sand, animal stories, counting through action songs and conversations with adults. The early years foundation stage provides the framework for learning, development and care.
At the January 2025 inspection, Ofsted found that staff identified learning gaps, sought external support promptly and used funding for early help, including specialist speech and language training.
The nursery opens from 7.30am to 6.30pm, Monday to Friday, with an all-year opening schedule.
Get in touch with the nursery directly
Manager
Yemi Adekoya (Manager)
Inspection outcome and judgement breakdown
FMS Inspection Score
Good
Based on 4 subcategory ratings
Official Ofsted Grade
Good
Inspected: 17 January 2025
Safeguarding: Yes
Quality of education
Good
Behaviour and attitudes
Good
Personal development
Good
Effectiveness of leadership and management
Good
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted. Always refer to the official Ofsted report for the full picture of a setting’s inspection outcome.
Other nurseries and nursery schools close to this profile.
Redbridge, IG8 7NA
Redbridge council
Out-of-school day care
0.0 mi away
Redbridge, IG8 7HX
Redbridge council
Out-of-school day care
0.1 mi away
Redbridge, IG8 7PG
Redbridge council
Full day care
0.2 mi away
Redbridge, IG8 7JQ
Redbridge council
0.3 mi away
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including Ofsted early years registration and inspection data, local authority records, and the setting’s own published material.
FMS Inspection Scores and any assessment on this page are derived from that data using our own methodologies. They are our independent analysis and are not official Ofsted ratings or standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Places, opening arrangements, session patterns, funding eligibility, and fees change without notice, and the nursery and/or local authority should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular nursery, and scores reflect specific inspection evidence rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.