Quality of education
Good
The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Last reviewed: October 2026 · Inspection data and key information above update regularly, however, this review below is refreshed bi-annually and may not reflect recent changes. Contact the nursery directly to confirm current arrangements. If you spot anything outdated or inaccurate, please let us know.
Imaginary monkeys in the trees and a sensory den give Good Shepherd Pre-School its character: playful exploration alongside space for children to manage their feelings. These were features of daily life in July 2025, rather than a promise about today's routine.
At its 16 July 2025 inspection, Ofsted rated the pre-school Good, judged safeguarding effective and highlighted strong progress for children with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) through targeted daily support. The setting has 28 places in total, at Good Shepherd Church Hall in Holbury.
In July 2025, children made kites and tested them outdoors, explored melting with toy sea creatures frozen into ice, and shared a swing. These examples brought investigation and cooperation into play. Children could choose their activities and resources, giving them opportunities to make decisions for themselves.
The early years foundation stage sets the requirements for children's learning, development and care: here, the July 2025 examples included conversation, practical exploration and learning to manage everyday tasks. Staff introduced vocabulary while discussing fruit and used clapping to explore the sounds within words. Communication ran through ordinary activities.
Enjoyment did not always translate into sufficiently precise teaching. In July 2025, some activities needed closer adjustment to what individual children already understood; adults also sometimes supplied answers before children had enough thinking time. Those are meaningful distinctions for parents weighing lively play against the depth of learning it produces.
In July 2025, children knew their key adult, and staff used knowledge of their interests to make favourite resources accessible. The sensory den helped children with SEND regulate their emotions, while special time involved identifying gaps in learning so staff could tailor support. Daily interventions followed that assessment.
Everyday independence also featured: children served themselves snacks and cleared up afterwards. Stories helped them recognise feelings and consider other people's emotions. Staff gave warm encouragement, although praise needed to explain more clearly what a child had achieved or could try again. Partnerships with parents and other professionals supported continuity between care and learning.
The address is Good Shepherd Church Hall, Bramble Close, Holbury, Southampton, SO45 2JP.
In July 2025, opening hours were 8.30am to 3pm on Monday, Wednesday and Thursday, and 8.30am to 1pm on Tuesday and Friday, during school terms. Children attending at that inspection were aged two to four. The setting provided funded early education at that time.
Good Shepherd suits families who value hands-on exploration and everyday independence, with its July 2025 practice giving a clear picture of both. For children needing targeted help, special time and the sensory den are important parts of that inspection-era picture. The balance to weigh is between engaging activities and the precision of adult teaching, including questioning and feedback.
Ofsted rated it Good at the inspection on 16 July 2025 and judged safeguarding effective.
Children attending in July 2025 were aged two to four. The setting has 28 places in total.
In July 2025, children built and tested kites, explored melting using frozen toy sea creatures, and developed vocabulary through conversations about fruit.
In July 2025, it provided funded early education for children.
At the July 2025 inspection, staff used special time to identify learning gaps and plan targeted daily interventions. Children also used the sensory den to help regulate their emotions.
Get in touch with the nursery directly
Inspection outcome and judgement breakdown
FMS Inspection Score
Good
Based on 4 subcategory ratings
Official Ofsted Grade
Good
Inspected: 16 July 2025
Safeguarding: Yes
Quality of education
Good
Behaviour and attitudes
Good
Personal development
Good
Effectiveness of leadership and management
Good
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted. Always refer to the official Ofsted report for the full picture of a setting’s inspection outcome.
Other nurseries and nursery schools close to this profile.
New Forest, SO45 2HW
Hampshire council
Full day care
0.2 mi away
New Forest, SO45 2GD
Hampshire council
Full day care
0.2 mi away
Southampton, SO45 1XA
Hampshire council
0.6 mi away
New Forest, SO45 2QG
Hampshire council
Full day care
0.7 mi away
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including Ofsted early years registration and inspection data, local authority records, and the setting’s own published material.
FMS Inspection Scores and any assessment on this page are derived from that data using our own methodologies. They are our independent analysis and are not official Ofsted ratings or standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Places, opening arrangements, session patterns, funding eligibility, and fees change without notice, and the nursery and/or local authority should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular nursery, and scores reflect specific inspection evidence rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.