Quality of education
Good
The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Last reviewed: October 2026 · Inspection data and key information above update regularly, however, this review below is refreshed bi-annually and may not reflect recent changes. Contact the nursery directly to confirm current arrangements. If you spot anything outdated or inaccurate, please let us know.
Runner beans, Christmas performances and singing for residents of a local care home give this South Molton nursery a recognisable character. In September 2025, children were learning through growing, performing and doing things for themselves, alongside play indoors and outside. Everyday independence mattered: pouring a drink or helping serve food formed part of the learning.
At its September 2025 inspection, Ofsted rated the nursery Good, judged safeguarding effective and found that work with specialists helped children with special educational needs and/or disabilities make progress. Two practical improvements were required: more consistent help for children to express needs and feelings, and better organisation of meals and changes between activities.
Based at The P I P Centre on Mill Street, the nursery has capacity for 50 children, with a current age range of 0 to 60 months. Its strongest appeal is the combination of practical learning and connections beyond the nursery, rather than a list of branded activities.
The early years foundation stage sets the requirements for children's learning, development and care. Here, September 2025 examples included songs to practise language, growing beans to explore the living world and outdoor movement to develop strength and coordination. These examples make the framework tangible: learning takes place through what children do, discuss and attempt.
During that month, babies joined in simple songs and repeated familiar words. Older children talked about the weather, with staff using questions to draw out their ideas. The useful distinction is between giving children something to repeat and making space for them to explain their own thinking. Both appeared in the day's activities.
Growing runner beans offered another kind of challenge. In September 2025, children asked to harvest their crop and persisted with twisting beans from the plant. It was a small, concrete task with a visible result, bringing effort and discovery together.
Outdoor play involved different physical challenges in September 2025. Babies propelled ride-on vehicles, while older children ran over slopes and climbed frames. The slopes are a useful physical detail: movement involved changes in terrain as well as climbing equipment.
Community experiences also gave children an audience beyond their immediate group. In September 2025, Christmas concerts and singing at a local residential home were examples of opportunities to perform for others. These were occasions to practise participation and confidence, rather than activities confined to the playroom.
Moving between rooms received practical attention in September 2025. Familiar staff accompanied children for settling sessions in the next room, and colleagues exchanged detailed information about them. That arrangement carried a familiar relationship into a new space, alongside information about the individual child.
Parents received updates about development and the next steps staff were working towards during that month. Learning sometimes extended home through a simple shared task: children took bags home to gather flowers for a nursery theme. This gave families something specific to contribute, rather than merely receiving an account of the day.
At the September 2025 inspection, Ofsted found that communication support was uneven: signing was used with some babies but not others, and preschool resources about emotions were not used consistently with children who needed them. The concern was about putting existing strategies into everyday practice, with consequences for children trying to communicate or manage feelings.
Meals and changes between activities were another September 2025 weakness. Preschool children waited while lunch was set up, and younger babies waited while older babies served themselves first. Independence was being encouraged, but the organisation left some children unsettled and waiting instead of participating.
A partnership with Action For Children at The PIP Centre South Molton provides a route to advice about health, education and tax credits. Its practical value is access to an adviser through a familiar childcare setting.
The nursery operates on weekdays from 8am to 6pm and runs throughout the year. That opening window provides a clear boundary for arranging work and family commitments.
The address is The P I P Centre, Mill Street, South Molton, EX36 4AS. Enquiries can be made on 01769 579842 or through the contact form, which allows families to select the South Molton branch.
In September 2025, the nursery provided government-funded childcare. Families should obtain a current written quotation for paid childcare.
Tarka Tots suits families seeking weekday childcare with practical learning and a connection to the local community. September 2025 examples give that character substance: growing food, physical challenges outdoors and performing for others all contributed to the nursery day.
The Good judgement provides a useful quality reference, but the two improvement points matter to daily experience. Communication support and the organisation of meals deserve as much attention as the activities themselves when deciding whether this setting fits your child.
Ofsted rated it Good at the inspection on 15 September 2025. Improvements were required in communication support and the organisation of meals and changes between activities.
Its current age range is 0 to 60 months, with capacity for 50 children in total.
In September 2025, examples included growing runner beans, singing, discussing the weather and outdoor physical play. Children also performed in Christmas concerts and sang at a local residential home.
It provided government-funded childcare in September 2025.
The nursery opens Monday to Friday, 8am to 6pm, throughout the year, at The P I P Centre, Mill Street, South Molton, EX36 4AS.
Get in touch with the nursery directly
Manager
Sharon Masson (Owner/Manager)
Owner
Tarka Tots Ltd
Inspection outcome and judgement breakdown
FMS Inspection Score
Good
Based on 4 subcategory ratings
Official Ofsted Grade
Good
Inspected: 15 September 2025
Safeguarding: Yes
Quality of education
Good
Behaviour and attitudes
Good
Personal development
Good
Effectiveness of leadership and management
Good
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted. Always refer to the official Ofsted report for the full picture of a setting’s inspection outcome.
Other nurseries and nursery schools close to this profile.
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including Ofsted early years registration and inspection data, local authority records, and the setting’s own published material.
FMS Inspection Scores and any assessment on this page are derived from that data using our own methodologies. They are our independent analysis and are not official Ofsted ratings or standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Places, opening arrangements, session patterns, funding eligibility, and fees change without notice, and the nursery and/or local authority should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular nursery, and scores reflect specific inspection evidence rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.