Quality of education
Good
The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Last reviewed: October 2026 · Inspection data and key information above update regularly, however, this review below is refreshed bi-annually and may not reflect recent changes. Contact the nursery directly to confirm current arrangements. If you spot anything outdated or inaccurate, please let us know.
Care for the children of school staff gives Manchester Junior Girls Creche a clear purpose. Based at Manchester Junior Girls School in Salford, it served families working at the school in May 2024, bringing childcare and parents’ workplace onto the same site.
At its 13 May 2024 inspection, Ofsted rated the provision Good and found safeguarding effective. The setting has capacity for 22 children; those attending at that visit were aged 0 to 2. That age range describes the children present then, rather than a current admissions limit.
In May 2024, learning followed children’s next developmental steps, with activities planned around what staff knew about each child. The early years foundation stage provides the framework for children’s learning, development and care. Here, the inspection-era examples included conversation, creative play, movement and growing independence.
Language practice was woven into ordinary tasks. In May 2024, staff talked through activities and introduced unfamiliar words, giving children opportunities to repeat them and join conversations. Older children practised washing their hands independently, making an everyday routine part of learning to manage for themselves.
Creative work also exercised small hand movements. Toddlers tore paper and used glue to make a tree, then manipulated pegs in pretend nest-building play. An obstacle course gave children a different physical challenge. These examples show how simple materials supported both imagination and practical skills.
Beyond the setting, children regularly explored nature and cultural activities in May 2024. Staff also allowed manageable challenges during play, giving children opportunities to try things for themselves.
Relationships were central to the May 2024 account. Staff knew the children individually, used comforting contact and gentle speech during settling, and were approachable when older children needed help. Familiar adults were an important part of the day.
A quieter toddler routine provided a change of pace: in May 2024, the room was dimmed for a circle activity centred on stillness. Families received weekly newsletters containing home activity ideas, alongside information about safer sleep and healthy eating. This connected nursery routines with conversations at home.
Support for sharing needed more consistency. In May 2024, staff used timers to help children take turns, but did not reliably help them recognise their own feelings or another child’s perspective when sharing became difficult. Understanding emotions and the effect of actions on others was the improvement priority.
The address is Manchester Junior Girls School, 64 Upper Park Road, Salford M7 4JA. The school-site setting matters practically because, in May 2024, its childcare was intended for employees’ children.
At that time, attendance ran during term time, Monday to Friday. Session times were 8.45am to 4.15pm, with a 2pm finish on Fridays in summer. The shorter summer Friday is an important distinction for families comparing childcare with their working hours.
In May 2024, the setting provided funded early education for children aged two and three. Nursery attendance does not guarantee a Reception place at the school.
For school employees seeking childcare on their workplace site, the May 2024 picture has a clear appeal: familiar adults, language-rich everyday activities and practical opportunities for independence. The Good judgement sits alongside a specific weakness in helping toddlers understand emotions. Its inspection-era term-time timetable and shorter summer Fridays are central to assessing whether it fits a family’s working pattern.
Ofsted rated Manchester Junior Girls Creche Good on 13 May 2024 and found safeguarding effective. Helping children understand emotions and their effect on others was the improvement priority.
Children attending in May 2024 were aged 0 to 2. The setting has capacity for 22 children in total.
In May 2024, activities included paper-and-glue creations, pretend nest-building with pegs, an obstacle course and outings involving nature and cultural activities. Staff also developed conversation through everyday tasks.
In May 2024, it provided funded early education for two- and three-year-old children.
In May 2024, families received weekly newsletters with ideas for activities at home, plus information about healthy eating and safer sleep.
Get in touch with the nursery directly
Inspection outcome and judgement breakdown
FMS Inspection Score
Good
Based on 4 subcategory ratings
Official Ofsted Grade
Good
Inspected: 13 May 2024
Safeguarding: Yes
Quality of education
Good
Behaviour and attitudes
Good
Personal development
Good
Effectiveness of leadership and management
Good
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted. Always refer to the official Ofsted report for the full picture of a setting’s inspection outcome.
Other nurseries and nursery schools close to this profile.
Salford, M7 4JA
Salford council
0.1 mi away
Salford, M7 4JD
Salford council
Full day care
0.2 mi away
Salford, M7 4LH
Salford council
0.2 mi away
Manchester, M7 4JD
Salford council
0.2 mi away
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including Ofsted early years registration and inspection data, local authority records, and the setting’s own published material.
FMS Inspection Scores and any assessment on this page are derived from that data using our own methodologies. They are our independent analysis and are not official Ofsted ratings or standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Places, opening arrangements, session patterns, funding eligibility, and fees change without notice, and the nursery and/or local authority should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular nursery, and scores reflect specific inspection evidence rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.