Quality of education
Good
The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Last reviewed: October 2026 · Inspection data and key information above update regularly, however, this review below is refreshed bi-annually and may not reflect recent changes. Contact the nursery directly to confirm current arrangements. If you spot anything outdated or inaccurate, please let us know.
Drainpipes, pouring water and animated storytelling give Farlea Childcare, St. Josephs its character. Children’s interests shaped the activities seen in April 2024, with practical exploration sitting alongside books, creative work and growing independence. This is childcare with a hands-on emphasis.
At its 24 April 2024 inspection, Ofsted rated the nursery Good, found safeguarding effective and judged that children, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities and those learning English as an additional language, made good progress. The setting has capacity for 32 children and is based at St. Josephs RC Primary School in Hednesford, Cannock. Children attending in April 2024 were aged two to four.
The early years foundation stage provides the framework for children’s learning, development and care: play, conversation and everyday routines help children build skills across areas of learning. In April 2024, staff used children’s interests to choose activities and address gaps in their learning. Water play became an experiment with pipes, buckets and jugs. Children extended the pipes together, testing how far the water could travel. That gave cooperation a practical purpose.
The Very Hungry Caterpillar brought a different kind of participation. During April 2024, children remembered parts of the story and anticipated what came next as staff read expressively. Conversations about caterpillars also introduced new vocabulary. Books and discussion therefore connected language with a subject children were already exploring.
Creative work had a physical element too. In April 2024, children made their own butterfly pictures in the art area and filled containers with compost indoors. These activities gave them opportunities to coordinate their hands and eyes while making choices about what to create.
Outside in April 2024, children practised balance, used swings and ran, while digging in sand and working in the mud kitchen offered smaller movements such as stirring and pouring. The outdoor provision supported both energetic movement and careful handling. The water-pipe activity added shared problem-solving to that mix.
In April 2024, warm relationships with staff helped children join in play confidently. Practitioners explained sharing and consideration for others, and redirected children before difficult behaviour escalated. Familiar routines gave children a predictable structure, while everyday tasks encouraged independence: younger children opened yoghurt containers, disposed of leftovers and put their coats on for outdoor play.
Communication with families extended beyond conversations. In April 2024, an online system carried developmental updates, and parents could contribute photographs and achievements from home. Regular stay-and-play sessions created opportunities to discuss progress and the next term’s goals. This gave families a way to connect experiences at home with nursery learning.
Food also supplied practical learning. In April 2024, staff provided healthy snacks, parents supplied packed lunches and lunchbox guidance supported healthier choices. Making fruit kebabs prompted discussion about different fruits, while toilet routines and independent handwashing developed self-care.
At the April 2024 inspection, Ofsted asked staff to recognise when children needed longer to think before answering questions. This is a useful point for families weighing the nursery’s language work: enthusiastic conversation needs space for a child’s response too.
The address is St. Josephs RC Primary School, Hill Top, Hednesford, Cannock, WS12 1DE. The branch enquiry number is 07790 080446.
In April 2024, the setting operated on weekdays during term time. Nursery attendance ran from 11.45am to 3.10pm; before-school provision ran from 7.30am to 9am, with after-school provision from 3.10pm to 6pm. These were separate parts of the day, so the nursery window should not be read as a continuous early-years day stretching from breakfast to evening.
In April 2024, funded early education was provided for children aged two, three and four. That participation is separate from the attendance timetable: the funding description does not itself establish which hours an individual family can use.
The school site is a practical part of the setting’s identity. Attending this nursery does not guarantee a Reception place at St. Josephs RC Primary School; families still apply through the local authority admissions process.
Farlea’s strongest examples are concrete: collaborative water experiments, expressive reading and ordinary tasks that build independence. Its April 2024 provision suited families seeking afternoon nursery attendance or before- and after-school care during term time. The Good judgement supports that picture, while the improvement point gives parents a precise aspect of staff interaction to explore. For families considering this school-site setting, the attendance pattern and children’s pace of communication are the key decision points.
Ofsted rated it Good on 24 April 2024 and found safeguarding effective.
Children attending in April 2024 were aged two to four. The setting has capacity for 32 children in total.
In April 2024, children experimented with water pipes, explored the mud kitchen and joined in expressive readings of The Very Hungry Caterpillar. Staff used children’s interests to shape activities.
In April 2024, it provided funded early education for children aged two, three and four.
No. Nursery attendance does not guarantee a Reception place; families apply through the local authority admissions process.
Get in touch with the nursery directly
Inspection outcome and judgement breakdown
FMS Inspection Score
Good
Based on 4 subcategory ratings
Official Ofsted Grade
Good
Inspected: 24 April 2024
Safeguarding: Yes
Quality of education
Good
Behaviour and attitudes
Good
Personal development
Good
Effectiveness of leadership and management
Good
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted. Always refer to the official Ofsted report for the full picture of a setting’s inspection outcome.
Other nurseries and nursery schools close to this profile.
Cannock, WS12 1DE
Staffordshire council
0.0 mi away
Cannock Chase, WS12 1AR
Staffordshire council
Full day care
0.3 mi away
Cannock, WS12 1AR
Staffordshire council
0.4 mi away
Cannock, WS12 1BE
Staffordshire council
0.4 mi away
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including Ofsted early years registration and inspection data, local authority records, and the setting’s own published material.
FMS Inspection Scores and any assessment on this page are derived from that data using our own methodologies. They are our independent analysis and are not official Ofsted ratings or standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Places, opening arrangements, session patterns, funding eligibility, and fees change without notice, and the nursery and/or local authority should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular nursery, and scores reflect specific inspection evidence rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.