Quality of education
Good
The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Last reviewed: August 2026 · Inspection data and key information above update regularly, however, this review below is refreshed bi-annually and may not reflect recent changes. Contact the nursery directly to confirm current arrangements. If you spot anything outdated or inaccurate, please let us know.
Communication is the clearest strength at Orpington Day Nursery 2. Ofsted rated the setting Good in February 2025, finding a well-sequenced and inclusive curriculum with a sharp emphasis on language. Children heard stories, sang regularly and had time to answer questions, while visual cards helped those with speech and language delay.
This is a 36-place setting for children aged three to five at Powell House, 13 Moorfield Road, Orpington, BR6 0HG. Its strongest case is specific: calm relationships, thoughtful language work and practical independence. Two priorities temper that positive picture, more accurate assessment of children's next steps and stronger opportunities for gross-motor development.
The Early Years Foundation Stage sets the areas of learning and developmental goals that shape children's days. In February 2025, those aims translated into vocabulary, conversation, singing and stories. Children showed a keen interest in books, while toddlers used scissors and mark-making materials to develop hand-eye coordination and manual dexterity. Messy play added tactile exploration.
Learning was inclusive rather than one-speed. Staff adapted communication for children with speech and language delay and for children learning English as an additional language. Observations and assessments did not always lead to realistic next steps, so the educational programme was stronger than the precision of its follow-through.
Physical development was the weaker strand. Children had too few opportunities for vigorous physical play and age-appropriate risk-taking to build gross-motor skills. Families for whom energetic outdoor challenge is a priority should weigh that improvement point carefully.
Calm, friendly interactions helped children settle and explore confidently in February 2025. Staff modelled kindness, encouraged sharing and turn-taking, and used gentle guidance when managing behaviour. Children also practised self-care by tidying, serving themselves at mealtimes, choosing activities and reaching resources independently.
Support for additional needs was practical. Visual communication cards were used alongside adapted adult interaction, and staff coordinated strategies with parents and other professionals so children with SEND could access the curriculum. Parents received regular updates about progress, current learning and next steps. This connection matters because coordinated strategies can carry the same communication support across the nursery, home and professional services rather than leaving a child to adjust to different approaches.
The February 2025 inspection judged safeguarding arrangements effective. Supervision, training and mentoring supported staff development, and the team worked together to evaluate practice. That professional structure gives leaders a route to improve weak points as well as preserve strengths. It is relevant to the two actions from the same visit: better assessment needs shared understanding among practitioners, while richer physical play needs deliberate curriculum planning rather than occasional activity.
The setting serves children aged three to five and has 36 places in total. Booking and session arrangements are an important part of the fit for each family. A full-day comparison should account for the child’s stamina as well as the household timetable; it is a decision framework, not a claim about the pattern sold here. It is based at Powell House, 13 Moorfield Road, Orpington, BR6 0HG. Families should request the nursery's current written quotation before comparing costs. The address and age range make the setting straightforward to identify, but practical suitability depends on matching its booking arrangements to the hours a household actually needs. Those details deserve to be settled before a family weighs the educational strengths against the physical-development priority.
Orpington Day Nursery 2 suits families seeking preschool care with a strong emphasis on talk, books, calm relationships and growing independence. The Good judgement is supported by concrete practice rather than a label alone. Its trade-off is equally clear: leaders needed to sharpen assessment and give children more demanding gross-motor experiences. For a child who benefits from deliberate language support and gentle social guidance, the strengths are meaningful; families prioritising vigorous physical challenge should test the response to Ofsted's improvement point.
Ofsted rated the nursery Good in February 2025. Inspectors praised its communication-rich, inclusive curriculum and calm relationships, while asking leaders to improve assessment and gross-motor opportunities.
The provider record covers children aged three to five, with 36 places in total.
Staff share stories, sing, introduce vocabulary and give children time to answer. Visual cards and adapted interaction support children with speech and language delay.
In February 2025, children tidied, served themselves at mealtimes, made choices and accessed resources independently.
The nursery is at Powell House, 13 Moorfield Road, Orpington, BR6 0HG.
Closed: Bank Holidays & 1 week at Christmas
Get in touch with the nursery directly
Manager
Sarah Faktor (Manager)
Owner
George Day Nurseries Ltd
Inspection outcome and judgement breakdown
FMS Inspection Score
Good
Based on 4 subcategory ratings
Official Ofsted Grade
Good
Inspected: 6 February 2025
Safeguarding: Yes
Quality of education
Good
Behaviour and attitudes
Good
Personal development
Good
Effectiveness of leadership and management
Good
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted. Always refer to the official Ofsted report for the full picture of a setting’s inspection outcome.
Other nurseries and nursery schools close to this profile.
Bromley, BR6 0HG
Bromley council
Full day care
0.0 mi away
Bromley, BR6 0JY
Bromley council
Out-of-school day care
0.1 mi away
Bromley, BR6 0EF
Bromley council
Out-of-school day care
0.3 mi away
Bromley, BR6 0TJ
Bromley council
Out-of-school day care
0.3 mi away
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including Ofsted early years registration and inspection data, local authority records, and the setting’s own published material.
FMS Inspection Scores and any assessment on this page are derived from that data using our own methodologies. They are our independent analysis and are not official Ofsted ratings or standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Places, opening arrangements, session patterns, funding eligibility, and fees change without notice, and the nursery and/or local authority should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular nursery, and scores reflect specific inspection evidence rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.