Inclusion
Needs attention
The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Last reviewed: October 2026 · Inspection data and key information above update regularly, however, this review below is refreshed bi-annually and may not reflect recent changes. Contact the nursery directly to confirm current arrangements. If you spot anything outdated or inaccurate, please let us know.
Outdoor play, a lending library and close relationships with staff give Early Miles Nursery some practical appeal, but substantial concerns about children’s learning and care dominate its latest assessment. This is a setting to assess carefully, rather than choose on its attendance options alone.
At its 20 May 2026 inspection, Ofsted judged achievement, behaviour and routines, welfare and wellbeing, curriculum and teaching, inclusion, and leadership and governance to need attention; safeguarding standards were met, while the requirements of both the compulsory and voluntary Childcare Registers were not met. These are separate judgements: the safeguarding outcome does not cancel the concerns about everyday supervision and education.
The nursery has capacity for 29 children, accepting ages from six months to five years, at Ragworth Neighbourhood Centre in Stockton-on-Tees. Full-day, morning, afternoon and specific funded sessions give families different attendance patterns to consider.
The Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) is the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care here. In everyday terms, it connects experiences such as play, conversation and physical activity with children’s developing skills; it is a requirement, rather than an extra offered by this nursery.
In May 2026, babies practised movement with staff, including building with blocks and walking around the nursery. Some older children joined small groups, took turns and listened to stories. These examples show opportunities for both physical development and shared activity, but they need to be read alongside the concerns about how consistently adults helped children learn.
The same month, children’s interest in dinosaurs led to paper and pencils being offered, before staff moved away to supervise others. Children then left the activity. That example makes the practical issue clear: putting resources within reach and providing sustained adult involvement are different parts of a nursery day.
In May 2026, climbing frames and balancing resources gave children opportunities to practise movement, while jumping along boxes accompanied the repetition of number names. Staff also helped children share outdoor equipment and cooperate. The outdoor area had been enhanced while leaders were working with the local authority.
A lending library was in use that month, with families encouraged to borrow books. It provided a straightforward connection between nursery experiences and reading at home. Neither the outdoor resources nor the library should be treated as evidence that the concerns about teaching had been addressed.
At the May 2026 inspection, Ofsted found that teaching and curriculum planning did not adequately develop communication or respond to individual needs, some children’s learning gaps persisted and school preparation was uneven, behaviour support and emotional care were inconsistent, eating was insufficiently supervised, progress checks were incomplete, SEND strategies were not put into practice, and leaders lacked effective oversight and sufficient staff development. The concerns reached beyond one activity or one part of the day.
In May 2026, children had close bonds with staff and leaders, and families exchanged information with the nursery regularly. Staff collected familiar words from home for children who spoke other languages, giving them recognisable language during settling. Leaders also adjusted session times in response to family circumstances.
Communication with teachers at local schools supported the transition from nursery that month.
The current team structure includes a SENCO lead and a safeguarding lead. Those roles establish points of responsibility; they do not, by themselves, demonstrate the effectiveness of support.
In May 2026, targeted development plans for children with SEND remained in their records instead of being used by practitioners. During changes between activities, repeated shouted instructions caused discomfort for some children with SEND. For families whose child needs individual adjustments, these concrete examples matter more than broad statements about inclusion.
Eating supervision was another serious issue that month: children sometimes wandered around while still eating, creating a choking risk. Alongside that concern, children practised handwashing, toilet use and independent toothbrushing, had access to drinks and spent time outside daily. These routines offered opportunities to build independence, but did not remove the supervision concern.
The address is Ragworth Neighbourhood Centre, St. Johns Way, Ragworth, Stockton-on-tees, TS19 0FB. The nursery operates across the year and closes on Bank Holidays. Contact is through its enquiry form, email or telephone.
A full-day booking runs from 7.30am to 5.30pm, matching the core opening window. Morning sessions have alternative starts of 7am or 8am and finishes of noon or 1pm; afternoon sessions run 12.00pm/1.00- 5.00/6.00pm. These are alternative session boundaries, rather than one fixed morning or afternoon timetable.
The 15-hour FFE funded sessions run from 9am to noon or from 1pm to 4pm. The same session times are offered for the 15-hour two-year funded provision. These shorter blocks are a different attendance pattern from a full day.
Both private childcare and funded childcare are offered. Eligible working parents with children from nine months to school age can access up to 30 funded hours weekly over 38 weeks, with Early Miles Nursery spreading that entitlement across its 51-week operating year. Spreading the funding changes how it is used across the year; it does not increase the entitlement.
Additional attendance beyond funded hours or weeks is charged privately. The nursery also accepts childcare vouchers. Current prices come in the nursery’s written quotation, with the structure explained on the fees and funding page.
Early Miles Nursery’s practical offer suits families considering either full days or shorter morning and afternoon attendance, including specific funded blocks. Its May 2026 outdoor activities, lending library and family communication provide useful detail about children’s experiences.
The decision, however, rests on the substantial concerns from that assessment. Supervision while eating, individual support, teaching and leadership all require close scrutiny. Attendance flexibility is useful, but families need a convincing account of how those issues have been addressed before choosing this nursery.
At the 20 May 2026 inspection, all six assessed areas needed attention. Safeguarding standards were met, but both the compulsory and voluntary Childcare Register requirements were not met.
It accepts children from six months to five years and has capacity for 29 children in total.
In May 2026, children used climbing frames and balancing resources, babies practised movement with staff, and families could borrow books through a lending library. These activities sit alongside the concerns about teaching in that assessment.
Yes. It offers up to 30 hours for eligible working parents of children from nine months to school age, stretched over 51 weeks, as well as 15-hour FFE and two-year funded sessions. Additional attendance is charged privately.
Full days run from 7.30am to 5.30pm. Morning and afternoon sessions have alternative boundaries, while the 15-hour funded blocks run from 9am to noon or 1pm to 4pm.
Closed: Bank Holidays
Get in touch with the nursery directly
Manager
Tina Marie Hunter (Manager)
Inspection outcome and judgement breakdown
FMS Inspection Score
Developing
Based on 6 subcategory ratings
Ofsted Report Card
No single overall grade under the current framework
Inspected: 20 May 2026
Safeguarding standards met
Inclusion
Needs attention
Achievement
Needs attention
Behaviour, attitudes and establishing routines
Needs attention
Children's welfare and wellbeing
Needs attention
Curriculum and teaching
Needs attention
Leadership and governance
Needs attention
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted. Always refer to the official Ofsted report for the full picture of a setting’s inspection outcome.
Other nurseries and nursery schools close to this profile.
Stockton-on-Tees, TS19 0FB
Stockton-on-Tees council
0.1 mi away
Stockton-on-Tees, TS19 9AD
Stockton-on-Tees council
0.4 mi away
Stockton-on-Tees, TS20 1QY
Stockton-on-Tees council
0.5 mi away
Stockton-on-Tees, TS19 0DS
Stockton-on-Tees council
Full day care
0.5 mi away
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including Ofsted early years registration and inspection data, local authority records, and the setting’s own published material.
FMS Inspection Scores and any assessment on this page are derived from that data using our own methodologies. They are our independent analysis and are not official Ofsted ratings or standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Places, opening arrangements, session patterns, funding eligibility, and fees change without notice, and the nursery and/or local authority should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular nursery, and scores reflect specific inspection evidence rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.